Karoline Leavitt’s Epic Clapback to Jim Acosta Ignites Media Firestorm

In a moment that has set social media ablaze, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt delivered a searing comeback to former CNN anchor Jim Acosta during a February 2025 appearance at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). Acosta’s dismissive remarks, labeling Leavitt a “kid” and accusing her of spinning “tall tales” for President Donald Trump, sparked a fierce response that not only shut down the veteran journalist but also revealed the deeply personal motivations driving Leavitt’s meteoric rise. The exchange, which culminated in Leavitt’s now-iconic line, “Jim, at least I have a job,” has become a rallying cry for her supporters and a flashpoint in the ongoing battle over media accountability. This clash, amplified by viral clips on X, exposes the tensions between legacy media and a new generation of conservative voices, while highlighting Leavitt’s unwavering commitment to her country and her young son.

 

Press Secretary Bites Back at Jim Acosta: 'At Least I Have a Job'

 

 

The Spark: Acosta’s Condescending Critique

The drama erupted when Acosta, appearing on the left-leaning MeidasTouch podcast on February 19, 2025, took aim at Leavitt, the youngest White House press secretary in history at age 27. In a patronizing tone, he called her a “kid” who was “telling a tall tale,” comparing her to a child spinning lies that any parent could see through. “She might be on the bench right now, but if she keeps working hard, does her homework, she just might make it onto Trump’s all-star team of liars,” Acosta quipped, referencing former Trump press secretaries Sean Spicer and Sarah Huckabee Sanders. He even suggested Leavitt’s briefings were so dishonest they belonged in a “Saturday Night Live” skit, declaring, “The skit writes itself.”

 

 

Jim Acosta faces backlash after he compares Karoline Leavitt to 'kid'

 

 

Acosta’s remarks, delivered with a smirk, were part of a broader critique of the Trump administration, which he accused of performing for “an audience of one.” But his focus on Leavitt’s youth and perceived inexperience backfired spectacularly, igniting a firestorm of backlash from her supporters and conservative commentators. On X, users lambasted Acosta’s condescension, with one writing, “Acosta lost everything at CNN because the network agreed with the people. He’s not a journalist, he’s an activist.” Another user jabbed, “Jim’s just jealous that young women are so much smarter & far more relevant than his washed-up old lying a–!”

Leavitt’s Mic-Drop Moment

Leavitt, never one to shy away from a fight, seized the opportunity to respond during a CPAC interview with Mercedes Schlapp on February 21, 2025. When Schlapp brought up Acosta’s comments, Leavitt paused, then delivered a line that brought the audience to its feet: “Since you brought up Jim Acosta—he’s been saying some not-so-nice things about me online, and I’ve resisted responding. But since you brought him up, I’d like to say, ‘Jim, at least I have a job, Jim.’ Okay? Just saying.” The crowd erupted in laughter and applause, and the moment quickly went viral, with X users hailing it as a “mic-drop” takedown.

 

 

Press Secretary Bites Back at Jim Acosta: 'At Least I Have a Job'

 

 

The quip was more than a witty retort—it was a pointed reminder of Acosta’s recent professional struggles. After refusing a late-night time slot during CNN’s lineup shakeup, Acosta parted ways with the network in early 2025, launching a Substack newsletter and appearing on podcasts to stay relevant. Leavitt’s jab underscored the contrast between her rising star and Acosta’s fading influence, a narrative that resonated with conservatives who view her as a fearless voice against media bias.

The Motivation Behind Leavitt’s Career

Beyond the headline-grabbing comeback, Leavitt’s CPAC appearance offered a glimpse into the personal motivations fueling her career. In a heartfelt moment, she spoke about her role as a mother to her young son, born during her time on Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign. “We have a country to save, and I want my son to grow up in a free and patriotic America that we can be proud of,” she said, her voice steady with conviction. “I try to remind myself of that every day.”

 

Karoline Leavitt has brutal comeback for Jim Acosta's 'kid' comments... as  she reveals what really motivates her | Daily Mail Online

 

 

Leavitt also addressed the challenges of being a young woman in a high-profile role, encouraging others to persevere despite naysayers like Acosta. “Don’t let anybody tell you you can’t achieve your dream or can’t get to that next step,” she urged. “Just believe in yourself, because there will be a lot of people who cast doubt about you, who talk bad about you… screw ‘em, it doesn’t matter.” Her words struck a chord, particularly with young conservative women who see her as a trailblazer defying stereotypes and media attacks.

Her rapid ascent—from communications director for Rep. Elise Stefanik to national press secretary for Trump’s 2024 campaign and now White House press secretary—demonstrates her resilience and talent. Despite her youth, Leavitt has navigated a cutthroat political landscape, earning endorsements from figures like Ted Cruz and Lauren Boebert during her 2022 congressional run in New Hampshire. Her ability to handle media scrutiny, as seen in her daily briefings, has only solidified her reputation.

A Broader Battle Over Media Accountability

The Leavitt-Acosta clash is more than a personal feud—it’s a microcosm of the broader struggle between conservative voices and legacy media. Acosta, a polarizing figure known for his confrontational style during Trump’s first term, has long been criticized by conservatives as an activist masquerading as a journalist. His remarks about Leavitt fit a pattern of dismissing young conservative women by focusing on their age or appearance rather than engaging with their ideas. “When was the last time you heard a young liberal woman in politics described as ‘just a kid’?” asked one commentator, highlighting the double standard.

Leavitt’s response, by contrast, was a masterclass in restraint and wit. Rather than stooping to Acosta’s level, she delivered a factual observation with just enough edge to make her point. Her approach reflects a sophisticated understanding of media dynamics, where conservatives are often accused of “attacking the press” for pushing back against misleading narratives. By keeping her cool, Leavitt avoided the trap of generating inflammatory headlines, instead letting her supporters amplify the moment.

The exchange has also reignited debates about media accountability. Leavitt’s briefings, where she reprimands reporters for what she calls “fake news,” have drawn both praise and criticism. Her decision to ban outlets like the Associated Press from Oval Office coverage over disputes like the “Gulf of America” renaming has sparked accusations of censorship, which she counters by prioritizing conservative outlets and independent influencers. Acosta himself criticized the press corps for not pushing back harder, even suggesting the AP sue the administration—a move that underscores his adversarial stance.

Public Reaction and the Path Forward

The public reaction on X has been overwhelmingly supportive of Leavitt, with users praising her poise and humor. “Karoline Leavitt schools loser Jim Acosta 🤣,” one post read, while another declared, “She’s a rockstar who’s not afraid to call out the media’s nonsense.” The backlash against Acosta has been equally fierce, with users mocking his departure from CNN and questioning his credibility. “Acosta calling someone a LIAR… now that’s rich,” one user wrote, reflecting a sentiment that his critiques lack weight given his own controversial history.

As the 2024 election cycle looms, the Leavitt-Acosta feud underscores the shifting media landscape. Leavitt’s rise, coupled with her ability to counter critics with both substance and style, positions her as a formidable figure in conservative politics. Her focus on her son and her vision for a “free and patriotic America” resonates with audiences seeking authenticity, while her clashes with figures like Acosta highlight the growing demand for media accountability.

The drama may have exploded with a single line, but its implications are far-reaching. Leavitt’s brutal comeback has not only exposed Acosta’s misstep but also cemented her status as a voice for a new generation. As she continues to navigate the White House briefing room and beyond, one thing is clear: Karoline Leavitt is here to stay, and she’s not backing down.