“Tommy Lahren Slams Andrew Tate Fandom and Its Impact on the Conservative Movement”

In a fiery commentary, Tommy Lahren, one of conservative media’s most vocal commentators, took aim at the growing Andrew Tate fandom within the MAGA community. While many in the right-wing sphere have embraced Tate and his brand of masculinity, Lahren is left perplexed by what she sees as a dangerous and misguided fascination. Tate, a self-proclaimed alpha male and influencer, has long been a polarizing figure, known for his controversial views on women and relationships. But Lahren’s stance on this issue is clear: embracing people like Tate undermines everything conservatives claim to stand for.

The Irony of Tate’s Influence on Conservatives

Tate’s rise within conservative circles has been nothing short of remarkable. From offering self-help advice to his followers, to claiming he has the key to true masculinity, Tate’s message has resonated with many young men. But for Lahren, the embrace of Tate by conservative figures is a deep contradiction. She argues that true masculinity isn’t about misogyny, disrespect, or objectification of women—it’s about strength, leadership, and being a protector and provider for the people you love. Tate, however, is the embodiment of everything that is wrong with today’s depiction of masculinity, according to Lahren.

Lahren expressed her concerns about the growing influence of Tate within the conservative movement, calling him a symbol of toxic masculinity that seems to have captured the imagination of young men searching for a role model. But what worries her more is that the conservative movement, a group that once prided itself on being faith-driven, is now embracing someone whose views and behavior are in direct opposition to the values many conservatives claim to uphold.

The Problem with Embracing Figures Like Tate

For Lahren, the real issue isn’t just Tate’s personal flaws—it’s the fact that the conservative movement is now willing to overlook these flaws in the name of political alliance. She draws a parallel between the embrace of Tate and the right-wing embrace of other controversial figures like Kanye West, who made headlines for his public support of Trump, but also faced accusations of anti-Semitism and inflammatory rhetoric. Lahren laments that, in the age of MAGA, conservative leaders are prioritizing loyalty over integrity, welcoming those who align with Trump’s brand of politics, no matter the cost to the movement’s credibility.

“What do we get from these figures?” Lahren asks, pointing out the paradox of conservatives celebrating men like Tate while dismissing real conservative values like faith, responsibility, and respect for others. Lahren believes that true masculinity should be about respect, not about using your power to dominate or objectify women, and definitely not about bragging about your conquests. She also takes aim at the double standard where the same people who reject toxic masculinity in liberal spaces, seem to celebrate it in the context of men like Tate.

The Real Damage: What Does Embracing Tate Do to Conservatism?

Lahren isn’t just criticizing Tate’s influence—she’s questioning the direction the conservative movement is taking in its embrace of people who represent the opposite of what it once stood for. Masculinity, as Lahren defines it, isn’t about being a jerk—it’s about honor, courage, and the ability to lead without demeaning others.

But instead of celebrating honorable masculinity, conservatives are falling into the trap of celebrating figures like Tate who preach messages that objectify women and encourage toxic behavior in men. This, Lahren argues, is the very opposite of the traditional values that conservatives claim to protect. The movement risks being overrun by figures like Tate—men who are proud of their toxic masculinity, using it to gain influence, manipulate followers, and further divide society.

A Call to Reclaim True Masculinity

Ultimately, Lahren’s message is simple: the conservative movement needs to reclaim true masculinity, a masculinity that protects, provides, and respects others. She argues that men should be strong, emotionally intelligent, and resilient, but they should also be able to show vulnerability and kindness when needed. Tate’s brand of masculinity, which encourages men to dominate and disrespect women, is unacceptable, and doesn’t align with the core principles of conservatism.

For Lahren, true masculinity isn’t about being the loudest in the room or performing for an audience—it’s about being genuine. It’s about having the strength to fight for what’s right, but also the wisdom to lead with empathy and integrity.

Conclusion: A Moment for Reflection

Lahren is challenging not just the MAGA movement, but the conservative movement at large, to reflect on the values they’re willing to compromise in exchange for political loyalty. Tate’s rise, Lahren argues, is a symptom of a deeper issue in the way conservatism is being shaped today. The values of masculinity, faith, and integrity need to be restored in a way that doesn’t compromise on the truth.

The embrace of toxic masculinity, and figures like Andrew Tate, is undermining the conservative movement’s credibility. True masculinity should be something worth celebrating—not just for political purposes, but for the future of society.

That’s the angle.