Tucker Carlson’s Seven Biggest Battles Against the Hidden Powers Shaping America

Tucker Carlson has never been afraid to speak his mind, challenging powerful institutions and calling out what he describes as a hidden power structure controlling political narratives. Over the years, he has taken aim at government agencies, mainstream media, and intelligence organizations, accusing them of manipulating public perception and silencing dissent.

Here are seven of the most controversial moments where Carlson claimed to expose the forces operating behind the scenes.

1. The Nixon Conspiracy – A Political Hit Job?

Richard Nixon’s resignation in 1974 remains one of the most infamous political scandals in American history. Most believe Watergate was the reason, but Carlson has long suggested a deeper motive. He argued that Nixon’s skepticism of intelligence agencies and his suggestion that they were involved in the assassination of JFK made him a target.

Carlson pointed to a recorded conversation between Nixon and then-CIA Director Richard Helms, where Nixon hinted at knowing “who shot JFK.” Helms’ silence in response, Carlson claimed, spoke volumes. He also questioned the role of Bob Woodward, the journalist who exposed Watergate, suggesting his background in naval intelligence made him an insider rather than an investigative hero.

2. January 6 – A Manufactured Crisis?

The storming of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, was widely portrayed as a violent insurrection. But Carlson challenged this view, arguing that intelligence agencies may have played a role in inciting the event.

He pointed to unindicted co-conspirators in legal filings related to the case, suggesting that some of those involved were working for the government. He also highlighted the case of Ray Epps, a man caught on camera encouraging protesters to enter the Capitol but never charged. To Carlson, this was evidence of an orchestrated setup.

3. The FBI’s War on Trump

From the moment Donald Trump entered politics, Carlson claimed he became a target of intelligence agencies. He argued that the FBI worked against Trump from day one, citing the surveillance of his campaign adviser Carter Page and the now-discredited Steele dossier.

Carlson also pointed to the FBI’s role in the plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, which involved multiple informants. He suggested this was another attempt to paint right-wing groups as domestic threats.

4. The NSA Spying Allegations

In June 2021, Carlson made a stunning claim: the NSA was monitoring his private communications. He alleged that a whistleblower had leaked evidence proving that the agency planned to release his private emails to discredit him.

Though the NSA denied he was a “target,” Carlson noted the agency’s careful wording, arguing that intelligence agencies often operate in legal gray areas to justify surveillance.

5. Media and Intelligence – A Secret Alliance?

Carlson has long argued that mainstream media works not as an independent watchdog but as a mouthpiece for intelligence agencies. He drew comparisons to Operation Mockingbird, the CIA’s Cold War program that recruited journalists to spread propaganda.

He pointed to how media outlets dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop story, claiming it was “Russian disinformation” in 2020—only for it to be verified later. To Carlson, this was proof that intelligence agencies shape public perception by manipulating news coverage.

6. The Ukraine Conflict – A Proxy War?

Carlson was one of the most vocal critics of U.S. involvement in the Ukraine conflict, arguing that it had little to do with defending democracy and more to do with advancing Washington’s geopolitical interests.

He questioned why billions of taxpayer dollars were sent to Ukraine while domestic problems like crime and inflation remained unaddressed. He also criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, suggesting he was being used by Western elites to push a larger agenda.

7. The Deep State’s Influence on Elections

Beyond individual events, Carlson has repeatedly warned of a broader “Deep State” working to maintain control. He has accused intelligence agencies of interfering in elections, suppressing dissent, and protecting establishment politicians while targeting outsiders like Trump.

His critics argue that his claims are exaggerated and based on selective evidence. But to his supporters, Carlson is one of the few voices willing to challenge the narratives pushed by those in power.

As the debate over government transparency and media influence continues, one thing is certain: Tucker Carlson’s battle against the Deep State is far from over.