Tucker Carlson Calls FOX NEWS “PROPAGANDA” in Stunning Interview — Seconds Later, Mark Levin ERUPTS With Blistering Response That Leaves Viewers Shocked and the Internet Drowning in IRONY

Tucker Carlson stunned audiences when he publicly labeled Fox News—his former home—as “propaganda.” The remark sent tremors through conservative media circles and lit up social media with disbelief and outrage. But it was Mark Levin’s furious reaction that truly stole the spotlight. Known for his fiery convictions, Levin didn’t hold back, calling Carlson’s words a disgrace and accusing him of turning his back on the very platform that elevated him. What sparked Carlson’s jab—and why did Levin take it so personally?

Get the full story on the moment that split conservative media wide open—click to see what really happened and why it’s not over yet.

Tucker Carlson, in a bombshell moment, referred to Fox News—his former platform—as “propaganda,” igniting a fierce backlash and igniting a sharp retort from conservative commentator Mark Levin. The clash, unfolding seconds apart, has sent shockwaves through conservative media and left the internet scrambling to parse its ironies.

Carlson’s Stunning Charge: “Propaganda Hose to Full Blast”

On Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, Carlson unleashed scathing criticism aimed directly at Fox News, accusing it of amplifying pro-war messaging: “They’re turning up the propaganda hose to full blast,” Carlson said, asserting that the network was intent on swaying elderly viewers toward conflict with Iran—spinning fear into policy support.

The once top-rated host didn’t hold back, labelling Sean Hannity, Levin himself, and Fox owner Rupert Murdoch as part of a relentless war-mongering machine. Carlson warned that these influential voices would “have to answer” for stoking public appetite for military intervention .

Levin’s Explosive Response: “Disgrace” & Turning the Tables

Enter Mark Levin—who answered the challenge with fury. On his radio show, Levin unleashed a blizzard of rebuke, calling Carlson’s claims a “disgrace” and accusing him of betrayal. Levin criticized Carlson not only for the “propaganda” charge but for turning his back on the very network that elevated him .

Levin didn’t hold back: he dismissed Carlson as “unhinged,” sarcastically deriding his departure from Fox as abandoning “the hand that fed you”. The segment ended with Levin declaring Carlson’s critique an unforgivable betrayal of conservative media unity.

Social Media Erupts: Spectacle of Irony and Shock

The internet immediately exploded. Carlson’s comments resurfaced debates about his legacy—particularly his history of promoting conspiracy theories and misinformation—prompting observers to highlight the irony of him now crusading against his former network’s alleged propaganda.

Meanwhile, Levin’s rapid-fire counterattack was praised by his base as a defense of conservative integrity. Many applauded his swift response to protect Fox News’ reputation and challenge a narrative they deem dangerous.

Broader Fallout: Reflecting a Deeper Conservative Schism

This showdown highlights a growing fracture within conservative media: one faction, led by Carlson and Steve Bannon, vehemently opposes military intervention; another, led by Levin and Hannity, supports a more hawkish stance. Embedded within this schism is a deeper ideological conflict about loyalty, media accountability, and the boundaries of dissent.

Bannon, for instance, has echoed Carlson’s sentiments, even framing Fox News as a “paid Israeli proxy”—a severe accusation that has poured salt into the wound.

Why This Moment Matters

This confrontation isn’t just personal—it’s symbolic. It challenges conservative audiences to confront complex questions:

What constitutes propaganda vs. legitimate journalism?

Can a former insider credibly critique the institution that elevated him?

Is it acceptable to turn media power against previous allies?

As one observer noted, Carlson’s pivot from insider to critic is “rich”—especially given his past amplification of conspiracy narratives favored by the network .

What Comes Next?

For Fox News, the feud poses a reputational and strategic dilemma. Should they address Carlson’s charges, or try to contain the narrative? Levin’s aggressive pushback suggests they’re doubling down on defense.

As for Carlson, his pivot beyond Fox signals a deeper ambition—to position himself as the true watchdog of conservative media.

One thing is clear: conservative media has entered turbulent waters, with alliances unraveling live on air and audiences watching closely.

Final Take

Tucker Carlson’s incendiary accusation—that Fox News is “propaganda”—and Mark Levin’s scorching counter-response have shattered the facade of conservative media unity. Their clash has dragged internal rifts into the public eye, forcing viewers to reckon with questions of allegiance, perception, and the evolving role of media in shaping narratives.

In the end, whether this remains a bold turning point or fades as another media spectacle depends on what comes next—and whether conservative media can survive this fracture or resurface with renewed identity.

See some choice reactions right here: