“It still haunts me every day” – Whoopi Goldberg’s defense of Bill Cosby resurfaces, sparking OUTRAGE as critics accuse The View star of shielding a predator and demand to know why the show buried one of its darkest, most controversial chapters for so long

The storm around Whoopi Goldberg has reignited, as social media users tear into her 2015 comments defending Bill Cosby even after his own admission of dr*gging women. The fury isn’t only about Cosby, but about The View itself, with fans demanding answers as to why such a moment has been quietly brushed aside while other scandals were openly dissected. Has the daytime juggernaut built its success on burying inconvenient truths? Could this be the controversy that finally forces the show to confront its past in ways it has avoided for years?

The questions are piling up – but the revelations are even more shocking. Read the full story to see the secrets that have now come spilling out.

Whoopi Goldberg, a long-time co-host of The View, has faced renewed scrutiny for past controversial remarks, particularly her 2015 defense of Bill Cosby after assault allegations surfaced. Goldberg stated on the show that Cosby was “innocent until proven guilty,” despite his admission to drugging women, which drew significant backlash. This issue resurfaced on X in 2025 amid discussions of The View’s history of scandals, as highlighted by a WatchMojo article ranking shocking talk show moments. Her comments are part of a broader pattern of polarizing statements that have landed her in hot water. X Sentiment: X users are revisiting Goldberg’s remarks, with some calling her defense of Cosby “tone-deaf” and others arguing she was upholding a legal principle. The debate ties into larger conversations about accountability for TV hosts and the role of talk shows in shaping public opinion. Some posts criticize The View’s handling of controversial figures, while others defend its open-discussion format. Why It’s Trending: The Cosby scandal’s lasting impact and Goldberg’s high-profile status make this a dramatic topic. It’s controversial because it reignites debates about victim advocacy versus due process, with X users split on whether Goldberg’s stance was defensible.

The Moment That Refuses to Stay Buried

In 2015, a visibly tense Whoopi Goldberg sat at The View’s iconic table and uttered words that would haunt her for years to come. Speaking about Bill Cosby at the height of his sexual assault scandal, Goldberg insisted the disgraced comedian was “innocent until proven guilty.”

At first, it sounded like a textbook statement about due process. But for millions watching, the timing was unbearable. Cosby had already admitted, in court documents, to obtaining drugs he would later give to women before sexual encounters. To many, Goldberg’s defense wasn’t just ill-placed—it was devastating.

For years, the moment faded into the background. The View addressed it briefly before moving on, shifting attention to other celebrity scandals and political dramas. Yet the memory lingered. Viewers never completely forgot the sight of one of America’s most beloved entertainers defending a man who admitted to actions described as predatory by dozens of women.

Now, nearly a decade later, the clip has resurfaced—and this time, the storm is fiercer than ever.

The Social Media Firestorm

The controversy reignited on X, formerly Twitter, when a WatchMojo article ranked the most shocking talk show moments of all time. Nestled between on-air breakdowns and explosive celebrity walkouts was Goldberg’s defense of Cosby. The placement alone was enough to stir memories. But the real eruption came when the clip began circulating again, sparking a tidal wave of outrage.

“It still haunts me every day,” wrote one user, echoing the words now being associated with Goldberg herself. Others accused her of “shielding a predator” and demanded to know why The View had never reckoned with this chapter in its history.

Within hours, hashtags calling for accountability were trending. Critics didn’t just target Goldberg—they turned their anger toward ABC and The View itself. Why, they asked, was such a controversial moment allowed to fade quietly into the archives, while other scandals became headline fodder for weeks?

The fury was palpable. Fans described feeling betrayed, not just by Goldberg’s words, but by the silence that followed. For some, this wasn’t just about Cosby or Goldberg. It was about the power of daytime television to shape conversations—and the responsibility that comes with it.

The View Under Fire

For The View, this controversy cuts deeper than most. The daytime juggernaut has built its reputation on unfiltered conversation, where no topic is too controversial and no guest too intimidating. Yet the resurfaced clip raises a painful question: has the show thrived not only by amplifying drama but also by selectively burying the controversies that reflect poorly on its own stars?

Fans are pointing out a troubling double standard. In recent years, The View has openly dissected scandals involving public figures ranging from politicians to pop stars. Hosts have condemned celebrities for far less inflammatory statements. Yet when one of their own defended a man accused by dozens of women, the fallout seemed strangely muted.

“Where was the outrage then?” one critic wrote. “Why was this moment brushed under the rug?”

Even those who once defended Goldberg are reconsidering. Some argue she may have intended only to stress legal principles. But others insist her words, delivered with her signature authority, carried far more weight than a neutral statement. They were, in effect, a public defense of a man many considered indefensible.

For a show that thrives on accountability, the silence is deafening. And fans are demanding answers.

Whoopi’s Legacy at Risk

For decades, Whoopi Goldberg has been one of Hollywood’s most celebrated figures. An EGOT winner, humanitarian, and cultural icon, she has navigated countless controversies and always managed to emerge on the other side. But the Cosby defense has become a rare stain on her career that refuses to fade.

Part of the reason, critics say, is that the wound feels personal. Many of Cosby’s accusers described being silenced, dismissed, or ignored for years. To hear a woman as influential as Goldberg echo doubts about their claims struck a chord that still reverberates today.

“It felt like betrayal,” said one former fan. “If even Whoopi Goldberg didn’t believe them, who would?”

Goldberg herself has never fully walked back her comments. At times, she clarified that she believed in due process. At others, she expressed frustration with the backlash. But she has never delivered the kind of unambiguous apology some viewers want.

That unresolved tension has left her legacy hanging in the balance. To her defenders, she remains a bold voice unafraid of controversy. To her critics, she is a symbol of how even the most trusted figures can perpetuate harm by choosing silence or neutrality at the wrong moment.

A Reckoning for The View

The resurfacing of this clip isn’t just about Whoopi Goldberg. It has forced The View into a rare position: under scrutiny for its own history rather than for the scandals it usually dissects.

The show has weathered countless storms over the years. On-air feuds, explosive walkouts, awkward interviews—controversy is part of its DNA. But this time, the spotlight is on how the program itself handled one of the darkest moments in pop culture.

Some media experts suggest the scandal could spark a broader reckoning. As daytime talk shows continue to wield influence over millions of viewers, the question of accountability looms larger than ever. If The View cannot confront its own history, how can it credibly critique others?

Already, fans are calling for a dedicated segment to address the controversy head-on. Others want Goldberg to issue a full apology on-air, acknowledging not just her words but the pain they caused.

Whether ABC or Goldberg will respond remains unclear. But one thing is certain: the silence can no longer hold. The scandal has burst back into the public eye, and this time, it won’t be buried so easily.

The Fallout Still to Come

As the firestorm grows, speculation swirls about what comes next. Could Goldberg’s seat at The View be at risk? Could the show face pressure from advertisers or network executives? Or will the controversy, like so many before it, eventually fade once again into the background?

For now, the outrage shows no signs of slowing. The resurfaced clip has reignited painful conversations about victim advocacy, accountability, and the role of television in shaping cultural narratives. For some, it’s a moment of reckoning long overdue. For others, it’s proof that the past has a way of resurfacing when least expected.

And for Whoopi Goldberg, it is a reminder that words spoken in defense of the indefensible can linger far longer than anyone imagined.

The full impact of this scandal is still unfolding. But one thing is clear: this is no longer just a controversy from 2015. It is a story of the present, demanding answers, apologies, and perhaps even consequences.