What Churchill Said When Patton Won the Race to Messina Should Be Noted Down In History

 

In the spring of 1943, Winston Churchill was fighting two wars — one against Hitler’s Germany, and another, quieter one, for Britain’s pride.

By then, the tide of war was finally turning. The British Eighth Army under Bernard Montgomery had beaten Rommel at El Alamein. The desert war, once a slog of humiliation and retreat, had ended in a victory Churchill called “the end of the beginning.” But for Churchill, El Alamein was not enough. The British Empire had been battered, its colonies stripped, its treasury drained. America had entered the war with vast armies and even vaster resources. Stalin’s Red Army was bearing the brunt of the fighting in the East. Britain, once the center of global power, was now the smallest of the Big Three.

Churchill needed more than victory — he needed vindication.

That vindication, he believed, would come on a rocky island in the Mediterranean: Sicily.

Sicily would be Britain’s stage, the great theater in which the world would once again see British mastery at war. Churchill intended it to prove that the old lion still roared — that British generals, British planning, and British courage still led the Allied cause. He wanted to show that Britain was not merely America’s partner, but its senior partner, the one with the hard-won experience and strategic genius the Americans lacked.

So when planning began for Operation Husky — the Allied invasion of Sicily — Churchill was intimately involved. He poured over maps, memoranda, and schedules, imagining the headlines. The British would take the decisive objective — Messina, the gateway between Sicily and mainland Italy. The Americans would play their part as dependable allies, mopping up resistance in the west while the British claimed the prize.

His chosen champion for this demonstration was Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery — “Monty,” the victor of El Alamein, now elevated to near-mythic stature in the British press. Monty was everything Churchill wanted the world to see in British leadership: calm, brilliant, disciplined, and utterly British. The Americans would flank him. They would learn from him. And when Montgomery marched into Messina, the newsreels would proclaim it as another British triumph.

Churchill made this vision explicit in a note to his Chief of the Imperial General Staff, General Sir Alan Brooke:

“Sicily will demonstrate to our American friends the value of experience and method. Montgomery shall show them how war is properly waged.”

It was not arrogance, Churchill believed, but natural order. Britain had fought since 1939. The Americans were newcomers — enthusiastic, yes, but still rough amateurs. Britain’s professionalism would shine.

The plan was structured accordingly. Montgomery’s Eighth Army would drive up Sicily’s eastern coast, through Catania and toward Messina, meeting the full weight of the German defenses. General George S. Patton’s U.S. Seventh Army would secure the western half of the island, protect Montgomery’s flank, and cover the rear. The Eighth Army would carry the main burden and win the glory.

Churchill was confident. So was Montgomery. And across the Atlantic, Franklin Roosevelt, ever the realist, smiled politely and said nothing. He knew the Americans were eager to prove themselves — and he knew George S. Patton better than Churchill did.

For Churchill, Patton was little more than a curiosity — a loud, swaggering cavalryman who cursed like a dockworker and strutted like a peacock. He’d met him briefly in North Africa and found him “amusing, but hardly refined.” To Churchill’s mind, Patton was a theatrical soldier, not a serious one.

In reality, Patton was exactly the kind of commander Churchill claimed to admire — bold, decisive, intolerant of hesitation. But because Patton was American, Churchill could not imagine him as an equal to Montgomery.

And yet, as the invasion plans moved forward, Patton was imagining something very different.

He did not see himself as anyone’s subordinate. He saw Sicily as a contest.

Continue below

On the night of July 9, 1943, the invasion of Sicily began. From their ships, British and American soldiers stormed the beaches under fierce winds and scattered resistance. Within days, both Montgomery and Patton had secured their landing zones and begun advancing inland.

At first, the British made steady progress along the eastern coast. But the terrain was brutal — narrow roads, steep hills, strong German defenses. The Germans, commanded by the wily General Hans Hube, fought delaying actions with surgical precision. Every village became a fortress, every road a gauntlet.

Montgomery advanced — but slowly.

Patton, meanwhile, was restless. His orders were clear: protect Montgomery’s left flank, secure Palermo, and wait for further instruction. But “waiting” was not in Patton’s vocabulary. As soon as his tanks entered Palermo, the largest city in western Sicily, the crowds hailed him as liberator. American flags unfurled from balconies.

For most generals, that would have been enough. For Patton, it was just the beginning.

Messina was calling.

Without waiting for permission, Patton began to push eastward along the northern coast — a move that, on paper, looked like initiative but in reality was a challenge. Montgomery was supposed to capture Messina. Patton decided to race him for it.

The “race to Messina” was never officially declared. It existed only in Patton’s mind and in the growing awareness of his staff. Every mile forward became a measure of pride. Every German roadblock became a personal insult.

By early August, Patton’s columns were surging forward at a punishing pace — armor grinding through bombed-out roads, engineers working through the night to clear rubble. Incredibly, his Seventh Army covered ground the British thought impassable. His men drove so fast that supply trucks struggled to keep up.

Montgomery, still battling German defenses on the eastern side, began to sense that something was wrong. Reports filtered in — American units moving north, faster than anyone expected.

At first, he dismissed it. The Americans were enthusiastic amateurs, he told his staff. They’d run out of steam soon enough.

But they didn’t.

By mid-August, Patton’s lead elements were within sight of Messina. The British were still fifteen miles away.

On August 17th, 1943, in the quiet of his country retreat at Chequers, Churchill was reviewing reports from the front when the telephone rang. His military secretary’s voice was crisp but hesitant.

“Prime Minister, there’s news from Sicily.”

Churchill grunted. “Go on.”

“American forces have entered Messina.”

There was a long pause. “American forces?” Churchill repeated slowly. “You mean they are with Montgomery?”

“No, sir. They were first. General Patton’s Seventh Army reached Messina this morning.”

Churchill blinked. “First? That’s impossible. That’s Monty’s objective.”

“Nonetheless, sir… the city is in American hands.”

For the first time in years, Winston Churchill was speechless. The cigar in his hand burned to ash between his fingers.

Patton — the loud American cavalryman he’d dismissed as a sideshow — had just beaten Britain’s finest field marshal to the finish line.

At Chequers, aides later recalled, the prime minister’s face turned the color of brick. He slammed the receiver down, then picked it up again.

“Get me Montgomery,” he growled.

The line crackled. For hours, communication lagged as cables were sent and calls relayed through field headquarters. When the connection finally came through, Montgomery’s voice was cold, clipped, every syllable a wound.

“Prime Minister,” he said, “the Americans have made a mockery of operational planning. Patton treated Sicily as a sporting contest.”

Churchill puffed smoke into the air. “Yes… I’ve been informed.”

“He has undermined Allied coordination for his own glory.”

There was silence. Then Churchill said quietly, “Perhaps. But the newspapers will say otherwise.”

Montgomery didn’t answer.

That night, as the news spread, the American press roared with celebration. “PATTON CAPTURES MESSINA — AMERICAN ARMY WINS SICILIAN RACE.” Photos of Patton, grinning broadly, appeared across front pages. He had done what no one expected — not only captured Messina, but captured the imagination of the American public.

In London, Churchill’s grand design for a British-led Mediterranean victory was unraveling in real time.

The next morning, as he reviewed the headlines, Churchill muttered to no one in particular, “Damn Patton… the man fights wars like a horse race — and wins them.”

But beneath the irritation, another feeling crept in — one that Churchill, ever the realist, could not ignore.

Admiration.

Patton had done in days what British planning could not do in weeks. The world had changed overnight — and Churchill knew it.

For the first time, the British prime minister began to suspect that the center of Allied power had quietly shifted westward, across the Atlantic.

The old lion had been outpaced by a younger one — and he would never forget it.

The morning after the news from Sicily, the halls of Chequers were unnervingly quiet. The prime minister’s aides moved like ghosts, careful not to disturb the storm gathering behind the closed doors of Winston Churchill’s study.

The great man himself sat hunched over his desk, cigar forgotten in an ashtray, smoke curling upward in lazy defiance of his mood. Reports from the Mediterranean lay scattered before him — dispatches, telegrams, newspaper proofs — all carrying the same impossible message: Patton had taken Messina first.

A victory for the Allies, yes. But for Churchill, it was also a humiliation — and one that struck at the very heart of what he had built.

For months, he had carefully cultivated a narrative. The British would lead. The Americans would assist. Sicily would be Britain’s demonstration of mastery — the reassurance that, though America might have the numbers, Britain still possessed the brains. And now, that illusion lay in ruins.

“Damn it all,” Churchill muttered, slamming a fist on the desk. “The man’s turned a campaign into a horse race.”

Across the room, General Hastings Ismay, his chief of staff, stood quietly, as he had through many such storms. “Prime Minister,” he said carefully, “it’s… certainly not what we anticipated. But the operation is a success. Sicily is ours.”

Churchill looked up sharply. “Ours? Whose, Hastings? The Americans are already claiming it. The headlines will say ‘Patton Wins the Race.’ Not ‘Allied Victory.’ Not ‘Montgomery Triumphs.’ They’ll say Patton. They’ll say America.”

Ismay hesitated. “They’ve earned their share of credit.”

Churchill’s eyes narrowed. “Credit? Perhaps. But not the crown.”

He stood abruptly, pacing to the window. The English countryside stretched beyond the glass, calm and green, utterly detached from the war raging across the world. He envied it.

In the months leading up to the invasion, Churchill had seen Sicily as a proving ground — not just of strategy, but of leadership. Britain, he told himself, was still the senior partner of the Allied world. The Americans might bring material, but the British brought mastery. Sicily was meant to remind the world of that.

But now, the balance had shifted.

It wasn’t just that Patton had reached Messina first. It was that he had done so without permission. The American general had defied the plan, rewritten the battle, and still achieved results. Worse — he had done it with such speed and audacity that even Montgomery, Britain’s model of discipline, had been left looking ponderous.

Churchill’s pride burned.

By midmorning, London’s War Cabinet had assembled. The ministers arrived tense, well aware that the prime minister was in no mood for diplomacy. They took their seats as Churchill entered, his expression hard, his pace quick.

He began without preamble.

“Gentlemen, you will have seen the reports. General Patton of the United States Army has taken Messina ahead of Montgomery. Against orders, against coordination, and with reckless disregard for the planned operation. He has—” Churchill paused, searching for the word— “embarrassed us.”

Silence.

Sir John Anderson, the Home Secretary, spoke first. “It was still an Allied victory, Prime Minister. The public—”

“The public?” Churchill snapped. “The public will see headlines. They’ll see photographs of American flags over Messina and decide who did the real work. And once again, Britain will be applauding from the sidelines of her own triumph.”

He paced before the fireplace. “Patton’s antics may delight the press, but they undermine discipline. This isn’t war, it’s theatre!”

Someone murmured agreement. Another ventured, “Perhaps we could frame the event as a joint success, sir?”

Churchill stopped pacing. He looked at them — these men who represented the last vestige of British power — and realized none of them understood. This wasn’t just about credit. It was about status.

For centuries, Britain had led the world. Its armies had conquered continents. Its generals had been the standard-bearers of discipline and command. Now, a brash American upstart had defied that order — and won.

Churchill inhaled deeply, his anger cooling into calculation. “We cannot afford open resentment,” he said finally. “Roosevelt must see unity, not discord. If the Americans believe we resent their success, they’ll shut us out of planning altogether. And that we cannot have.”

His tone shifted — the statesman reasserting control over the wounded pride. “We’ll issue a statement emphasizing cooperation. Shared effort. Combined triumph.” He looked around the table. “But make no mistake — history will know the truth. Montgomery fought the Germans. Patton fought for headlines.”

The ministers nodded dutifully. But the remark — captured in the minutes of that meeting — would haunt Churchill’s reputation for years.

That night, Churchill dictated a telegram to the White House. His tone was formal, polished, and painfully restrained.

“The conquest of Sicily stands as a testament to Allied cooperation and courage. Our armies, fighting as one, have triumphed over a determined enemy. Montgomery’s Eighth Army bore the brunt of the German resistance, while Patton’s Seventh Army advanced swiftly along the northern coast to secure Messina. The result is complete victory — British tenacity and American vigor in perfect harmony.”

The message was masterful diplomacy — a blend of flattery and subtle deflection. It praised Patton’s “swiftness,” but stressed that Montgomery had faced the tougher fight. It called the operation “joint,” but placed British effort first in the sentence.

Across the Atlantic, Roosevelt read the telegram with amusement. “Perfectly Churchill,” he said, handing it to his aide. “Praises cooperation while reminding us who’s meant to be in charge.”

He smiled faintly. “But it won’t work this time.”

Roosevelt knew the truth. He had already received Patton’s exuberant cable from Sicily — “Messina taken! No more enemy on the island. Seventh Army victorious!” He’d also seen the photographs: Patton, hand on hip, grinning beside an American flag. It was irresistible.

The American press had their hero. And Roosevelt, ever the politician, knew better than to stand in the way of that narrative.

Churchill’s telegram was published in part the following day. British papers obediently echoed its tone — emphasizing Allied unity and British leadership. But even The Times could not bury the headline splashed across every American newspaper: “PATTON TAKES MESSINA.”

It was a public relations catastrophe for Churchill.

If Churchill was furious, Montgomery was incandescent.

In his headquarters outside Messina, the British field marshal received the news with disbelief. He had fought every mile against some of the best troops in the German Army. His men had bled for every hill and bridge. And now, as his columns reached the city, they found it already occupied — by Americans.

When Churchill finally reached him by telephone that evening, Montgomery’s voice was brittle with rage.

“Prime Minister, the Americans have humiliated us. Patton turned a serious operation into a race for headlines. His men interfered with coordination. He’s made a mockery of discipline.”

Churchill’s instinct was to agree. But even in anger, his political mind remained sharp. “Monty,” he said carefully, “you fought brilliantly. You faced the main German defenses. Everyone knows that. Don’t let this… incident rob you of dignity.”

Montgomery was not mollified. “Dignity?” he spat. “He’s stolen the prize!”

Churchill hesitated. “Then let him have his prize. The Americans need their heroes. And we need their armies. Let him enjoy his headlines — they’ll fade soon enough. You, Monty, will still have the respect of professionals.”

It was good advice — though Churchill himself did not entirely believe it.

That night, after the calls were done and the official statements sent, Churchill retreated to his study with a glass of brandy. He sat in silence, replaying the day in his mind — the humiliation, the headlines, the realization that something fundamental had shifted.

His private secretary recorded a remark that would later become famous:

“We handed the Americans a supporting role, and they turned it into a leading part. The lion has taught its cubs too well.”

For the first time, Churchill confronted a truth he had long avoided — that Britain was no longer the senior partner in the alliance. America’s armies were growing, its industry was unstoppable, and its generals were beginning to outshine Britain’s own.

In a letter to General Smuts a week later, he confessed his unease:

“The Americans have shown qualities we underestimated — speed, aggression, resource. Patton, for all his vulgarity, possesses an instinct for war we should not dismiss. I fear we British have grown too methodical. The Americans are less cautious, but they achieve results.”

It was a remarkable admission from a man who had built his career on the myth of British superiority.

In the quiet of that August night, Churchill realized something no public statement would ever reveal: the war had entered a new phase — one in which Britain could no longer dictate the pace. The Americans, with their energy and their confidence, were becoming the dominant force.

The student had outpaced the master.

And Churchill, ever the historian, understood better than anyone that the shift of power, once begun, could never be reversed.

Still, he would not surrender his dignity. Not yet.

He raised his glass to the empty room, his voice low and bitterly amused. “To Patton,” he murmured. “The most insolent bastard alive — and damn him, the best.”

By September 1943, the war had shifted — not in territory, but in hierarchy. The banners over Messina had long since been lowered, yet the echoes of that moment still reverberated through every Allied headquarters. The Americans had proven something that no speech, no memorandum, no Churchillian flourish could undo.

They had proven that the balance of power within the alliance had changed — forever.

For Winston Churchill, it was a lesson he would absorb reluctantly, painfully, and yet — as history would show — wisely.

Churchill was no stranger to humiliation. He had endured Gallipoli, Singapore, and the loss of France. But this was different. Those disasters had been inflicted by the enemy. The humiliation at Messina had come from within his own alliance — and it carried the sting of a generational shift.

In early September, as British and American forces prepared to invade mainland Italy, Churchill summoned his Chiefs of Staff to Chequers for what one aide described as “a meeting of gravity and smoke.”

The prime minister began quietly, almost too quietly. “Gentlemen,” he said, “the Americans have outpaced us in Sicily. It cannot be denied.” He paused, studying their faces. “We must understand why.”

General Alan Brooke, loyal and honest to a fault, tried to soften the blow. “Prime Minister, the Americans had a lighter opposition along their route. The Germans concentrated their defenses against Montgomery. It was—”

Churchill raised a hand. “Don’t dress it, Alan. We were outmaneuvered. Outdriven. Patton reached the objective first. We had the harder road, yes — but that isn’t all of it.”

He began pacing. “Patton fought as if the war depended on his speed. He broke every rule, every convention, and yet he won. And what did we do? We followed our rules, our schedules, our meticulous plans… and we arrived late.”

He stopped at the fireplace, leaning on his cane. “We’ve become too cautious. Too bureaucratic. Too… British.”

No one spoke. The weight of the admission hung heavy in the room.

Then Churchill said something none of them expected. “I want our generals to study Patton — not to imitate his manner, God forbid — but to understand his tempo. That is the new warfare. Swift, audacious, ruthless in execution. If we don’t match it, we’ll always be following the Americans.”

It was the first time Churchill had said aloud what he had already come to believe: that Britain’s leadership in the war — and perhaps in the world — was slipping, and that Messina had made it undeniable.

In the months that followed, Churchill’s private papers reveal a subtle but profound change in his tone toward American generals.

Before Sicily, his memoranda were laced with paternalism — reminders that Britain’s experience should guide the Americans, suggestions that Montgomery’s staff could “advise” Eisenhower’s. After Messina, the language softened. The word advise became coordinate. The assumption of seniority gave way to the language of partnership.

To his confidant Jan Smuts, Churchill wrote candidly:

“The Americans are no longer apprentices. They are partners — loud, brash, impulsive perhaps, but formidable. Their energy is ungovernable, but so too is their success. We must learn to live with it — or be eclipsed by it.”

This was not resignation. It was adaptation.

Churchill understood what many in his War Cabinet did not: that British influence would survive only if it learned to flow with American power, not against it. The special relationship could no longer be built on the illusion of British mentorship. It had to be a partnership of equals — one side bringing endurance and experience, the other bringing speed and scale.

And yet, despite this growing realism, Churchill’s pride was not easily subdued.

In one late-night conversation with General Ismay, he confessed, “If I were twenty years younger, Hastings, I’d have raced Patton myself. Damn him, he’s the sort of man who makes you furious and envious in the same breath.”

Ismay smiled carefully. “You respect him, sir.”

Churchill exhaled through his cigar. “Respect? I despise his manners, his vanity, his… American brashness. But yes. I respect him. Because he wins.”

In November 1943, word of Patton’s infamous “slapping incidents” reached London. Two soldiers — shell-shocked, trembling wrecks of men — had been struck by the general for what Patton called “cowardice.” The news hit the Allied command like a grenade.

Within hours, American newspapers were buzzing. Congress demanded Patton’s dismissal. British officers smirked privately — at last, the loud American was exposed for what he was: a brute, undisciplined, unfit for command.

But Churchill did not smirk.

When Eisenhower sought advice from London, Churchill’s response surprised even his own staff. He recommended that Patton be retained.

“Patton may be flawed,” he told the American ambassador, “but he is indispensable. You cannot court-martial victory.”

It was the clearest proof yet that Churchill’s view of Patton — and of America — had evolved. The old Churchill would have seized the opportunity to remind Roosevelt that British officers, whatever their flaws, knew the difference between discipline and barbarism. The new Churchill understood that results mattered more than appearances.

In his diary, Alan Brooke noted, “The PM defended Patton with more conviction than he ever showed for Monty. It is an extraordinary reversal.”

Extraordinary, yes — but logical. Churchill had seen what Patton’s kind of war could achieve. He may not have liked the man, but he had come to believe that victory — true, unstoppable victory — required his kind of audacity.

That winter, at the Allied conference in Tehran, Churchill and Roosevelt shared one of their late-night brandy-fueled conversations — the kind that shaped the course of history as much as any treaty.

They spoke of Italy, of Stalin’s demands, of the coming invasion of France. But inevitably, the topic turned to Sicily.

Churchill sighed. “Your General Patton… he’s an extraordinary creature. Part cowboy, part Caesar. He charges at the enemy like a bull and then apologizes like a poet.”

Roosevelt chuckled. “He wins, Winston. Americans like winners.”

“Yes, well,” Churchill said, swirling his glass, “so does history.”

He leaned forward, lowering his voice. “I’ll tell you something I haven’t said to anyone else. When Patton took Messina ahead of Montgomery, I was furious. Not because he succeeded, but because he made us realize — in one stroke — that Britain’s day of leading by right had passed. We are partners now, Franklin. Whether we like it or not.”

Roosevelt smiled softly. “You’ll always be the voice of the alliance, Winston. But yes — perhaps the baton is passing.”

Churchill raised his glass. “Then may the race be won by the right team.”

It was half a joke, half an epitaph for an empire.

Years later, when Churchill wrote his War Memoirs, he revisited the story of Sicily with surprising candor. The pages that described Patton’s victory over Montgomery carried none of the bitterness of 1943.

Instead, he wrote:

“General Patton’s capture of Messina, achieved through operational audacity and speed, revealed capabilities I had not expected. He demonstrated that American forces possessed not only material strength but the instinct for bold maneuver. It was, in truth, a victory for the Allied cause and a lesson for us all.”

It was Churchill’s way of doing what few men of his stature ever could — acknowledging change.

He went further still.

“Messina taught me that the Americans would not accept subordinate roles. They demanded equality, and by right of their deeds, they deserved it. It was the moment I understood that the special relationship between our nations could endure only if built upon partnership, not hierarchy.”

That single paragraph — understated, elegant, but unmistakably clear — was Churchill’s quiet confession that the old world had ended on the road to Messina.

Britain’s empire would survive the war, but not its aftermath. America would emerge as the dominant force in the West. And Churchill — who had once believed his country would lead forever — had been the first to see it happen.

After the war, as he reflected in his final years, Churchill often returned to that August afternoon in 1943. He would tell guests, with a wry smile, “That damned Patton won the race I never authorized — and in doing so, reminded me that the future seldom asks permission.”

Those who heard him say it would laugh, assuming it was just another of Churchill’s clever anecdotes. But to those who knew him best, the line carried something deeper — not resentment, but acceptance.

He understood that the history he had spent his life defending had given way to a new one. The Americans would lead now — with all their brashness and power — and Britain’s role would be to guide, to counsel, to remind the world where the torch had come from.

Patton’s capture of Messina did more than end a campaign. It ended an era.

The British Empire had once raced across the world, confident that it could never be outrun. But on that hot Sicilian morning, it was — by an American with a pearl-handled revolver, a swaggering gait, and a conviction that nothing was impossible.

And when Churchill raised his glass to that memory, it was not in bitterness, but in respect.

“History,” he once said, “is written by the victors.”

He had always assumed that meant Britain.

After Messina, he knew it meant something larger — that the torch of victory, once held by the empire, now burned in American hands. And Churchill, ever the historian, made sure to note it down.

“When Patton won the race to Messina,” he wrote in his final reflections, “he did not merely seize a city. He announced to the world that a new power had arrived. I was angry then. I am grateful now. For in that moment, I saw that freedom’s cause would not die with Britain’s decline — it would endure in America’s rise.”

He underlined the final sentence in blue ink — as he often did when a thought felt final, conclusive.

And that, perhaps, was Churchill’s last great act of leadership: the humility to recognize that history had moved on, and the wisdom to step aside without bitterness.