In a rare moment of agreement, two prominent figures from opposing political sides—Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld and liberal icon Bill Maher—joined forces to take down The View, accusing the show of abandoning its original purpose and devolving into a platform for one-sided opinions and performative activism. The epic roast, which has since gone viral, sheds light on the current state of daytime talk shows, revealing a disturbing trend where ideological conformity trumps open discussion.

The Trigger: A Ridiculous Mockery of The View

It all began when Gutfeld and Maher—each known for their sharp wit and unrelenting criticisms—had enough of The View’s increasingly predictable and biased format. Gutfeld, a conservative commentator with a penchant for sarcasm, pointed out that the panel was no longer about debate, but about ideological theater. He mocked the show’s inability to allow true dissent and its focus on “performative activism” over meaningful discussion.

“It’s not a talk show anymore,” Gutfeld said. “It’s a Broadway show with dimmer lights and way louder eyebrows. They’re not having a discussion; they’re performing a script.”

The crux of the issue lies in The View’s ongoing disregard for ideological diversity. Gutfeld’s and Maher’s frustration with the show boiled over as they collectively argued that the hosts, especially Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, and Sunny Hostin, were more interested in enforcing political conformity than fostering genuine conversation.

The Laughable Irony: The View Turns into an Echo Chamber

Bill Maher, always one to push boundaries, didn’t mince words. He called The View a “cult-like” atmosphere where anyone who dares to disagree with the mainstream narrative is treated as a pariah. The show, once known for its diverse perspectives, had become a stage where left-wing talking points were repeated ad nauseam, and any alternate viewpoints were met with scorn.

“It’s like watching a Twitter thread come to life—chaotic, confusing, and loud for no reason,” Maher remarked, comparing the show’s approach to debate to the divisive nature of online discourse. “I think we’ve lost something fundamental. The View used to have intelligent debates. Now, it’s just one-sided shrieking.”

Both Maher and Gutfeld argued that the hosts of The View had created a highly controlled environment where every participant had their script, and any deviation from it was not tolerated. “They don’t even pretend to be interested in hearing something new anymore,” Gutfeld added.

A Crucial Moment: Calling Out the Race Card

The turning point in their takedown came when the conversation shifted toward issues of race. Gutfeld and Maher expressed disbelief at The View‘s frequent use of the race card to shut down any debate they didn’t agree with. The hosts, they argued, were quick to accuse their political opponents of being racially insensitive or outright racist whenever they challenged the show’s leftist agenda.

“You’re not just criticizing someone—you’re calling them a racist,” Maher said. “And that’s when the conversation stops. When you label people, you stop the conversation. You don’t engage with them.”

The hosts of The View were particularly criticized for their treatment of Black conservatives, such as Clarence Thomas and Tim Scott, who were often labeled as “traitors to their race” for their political views. Gutfeld and Maher both took issue with this approach, arguing that it silenced independent Black voices and created a dangerous narrative that anyone who doesn’t fit into the left-wing mold is a “sell-out.”

“We’re not a monolith,” Gutfeld continued. “And the left’s insistence on defining people based on skin color, as if that’s the only thing that matters, is not just disrespectful—it’s dangerous.”

Whoopi Goldberg’s Absence: The Unspoken Elephant in the Room

As the debate continued to intensify, Gutfeld took a shot at The View‘s moderator, Whoopi Goldberg, who was notably absent from the segment. He joked about her predictable responses, adding, “For someone named Sunny, she sure is cloudy,” referring to the show’s frequent reliance on a narrow, one-sided perspective.

“Joy Behar once dressed up as a Black woman for Halloween, and suddenly she’s the expert on race,” Gutfeld quipped, mocking Behar’s past attempt at cultural appropriation. “Yet when people like me call out the hypocrisy, I get labeled as the bad guy.”

It’s no secret that Goldberg and Behar have been central figures on The View, but in this exchange, Maher and Gutfeld seemed to agree that the show had devolved into a shallow echo chamber, where anything outside the left-wing orthodoxy was immediately dismissed.

Tyrus and Maher’s Shared Frustration: A Call for Nuance in Politics

What stood out most in this exchange wasn’t just the sharp rhetoric, but the shared frustration between two figures from opposing political spectrums. While Maher is often seen as the voice of liberal dissent, and Gutfeld as a leading conservative, their mutual frustration with The View and the media’s obsession with creating divisive narratives was a telling moment in the broader media landscape.

“We don’t need more people pointing fingers and shouting. We need people who want to have real conversations,” Maher emphasized.

This call for nuance in political discourse is something that both Gutfeld and Maher have championed throughout their careers. They argue that while media outlets like The View may cater to a specific audience, the absence of diverse viewpoints only contributes to the growing polarization in America.

The Aftermath: Social Media Explodes with Reactions

The confrontation between the two media figures and The View sparked an immediate wave of reactions on social media. Fans of Gutfeld and Maher celebrated the takedown, calling it a “much-needed intervention” for a show that they believed had become too predictable and divisive. On the other hand, fans of The View defended the show’s hosts, arguing that it was simply offering a platform for progressive voices that are underrepresented in mainstream media.

The hashtags #TyrusTruth and #ViewExposed quickly gained traction on Twitter and X (formerly Twitter), and the clip of the debate went viral, reaching millions. While opinions on the matter remain divided, one thing is clear: the confrontation sparked a larger conversation about media bias, ideological echo chambers, and the role of race in modern political discourse.

Conclusion: A Turning Point for The View?

As the fallout from the explosive exchange between Tyrus, Maher, and The View continues to unfold, it’s clear that the show is at a crossroads. The division between the liberal and conservative voices is only becoming more pronounced, and the future of political discourse in America is becoming increasingly fragmented.

The clash between Gutfeld, Maher, and The View serves as a stark reminder of the growing polarization in both media and society. It also underscores the importance of fostering open, honest debates—where differing viewpoints can be heard, discussed, and respected, without resorting to name-calling and labels.

Ultimately, the question remains: Will The View continue down its current path, or will it take steps to embrace a broader range of perspectives, ensuring that real discussions—rather than ideological battles—take center stage? As the media landscape evolves, the stakes are higher than ever.