Fox News host Greg Gutfeld has come under fire after delivering a brutal, nine-word attack on former President Joe Biden during a recent panel segment on The Five. The comments, which many viewers have deemed tasteless, immediately sparked controversy online and led to widespread criticism, further intensifying the ongoing debates over the tone of political discourse.

The Outburst: A Callous Attack

The heated moment began during a discussion of Biden’s first post-presidency interview with the BBC. As the panel delved into the implications of Biden’s remarks, Gutfeld wasted no time in delivering a sharp critique. In a moment that shocked viewers, he yelled, “Go literally out to pasture and die.” His words, directed at the former president, were jarring and met with both laughter from his co-hosts and audible gasps from the audience.

The comment, which was part of a broader tirade, drew immediate backlash for its callousness. Gutfeld, known for his irreverent style and sharp commentary, attempted to clarify his statement, calling it a “political hangover” caused by Biden’s administration. However, his attempt to frame his remarks as light-hearted political humor only seemed to fuel the outrage.

“Anomaly, Facade, Placeholder”: Gutfeld Continues His Criticism

Not content with the initial shock value, Gutfeld continued to criticize Biden in even harsher terms. “We need to see this because we can’t forget the abomination of this president,” Gutfeld declared, continuing his onslaught. He referred to Biden as “an anomaly, a facade, a placeholder, a trick played on the American public,” reinforcing his argument that Biden’s presidency was less about leadership and more about a symbolic figurehead.

The tone of Gutfeld’s remarks grew increasingly harsh. He described Biden as “emerging from the crypt with his old man smell,” a comment that drew laughter from some of his co-hosts. However, many viewers found the joke distasteful, with some calling it an unnecessary attack on a person’s age and health. Gutfeld’s words were intended as humor, but they landed with a force that many saw as cruel and insensitive.

Media Criticism and Viewer Backlash

The backlash was swift and intense. Viewers took to social media to express their outrage, with one X (formerly Twitter) user describing Gutfeld’s comments as “ghoulish.” Another user mocked the Fox News host with the nickname “Greg GutRot,” a play on his last name that encapsulated the disgust many felt after hearing the remarks.

The outcry wasn’t just limited to viewers. Critics argued that Gutfeld’s words represented a disturbing trend in modern political commentary—one that seeks to alienate and dehumanize political figures rather than engage with them constructively. While it’s not uncommon for political commentators to use harsh language, Gutfeld’s remarks about a former president, who remains a prominent figure in American politics, crossed a line for many.

A Familiar Pattern: Gutfeld’s Controversial On-Air Moments

This outburst is far from the first time Gutfeld has made headlines for controversial comments. Known for his no-holds-barred approach to political commentary, Gutfeld has often stirred controversy with his blunt opinions and caustic humor. His previous remarks about other political figures, such as dismissive comments about the media and references to “dead people” when discussing CNN or MSNBC, have similarly sparked backlash.

While Gutfeld has built a career on his bold and provocative style, many are beginning to question whether this approach is crossing the line into harmful rhetoric. His penchant for making personal attacks rather than focusing on policy discussions has garnered mixed reviews, with some applauding his willingness to speak freely, while others criticize him for perpetuating divisiveness and cruelty.

A Divided Audience: Laughter or Disdain?

On the one hand, Gutfeld’s sharp-tongued style resonates with his audience, particularly those who share his conservative views. His ability to stir up controversy and generate strong reactions has earned him a loyal following. The laughter from his co-hosts during the on-air exchange only reinforced the notion that Gutfeld’s remarks are often seen as part of the show’s irreverent humor.

However, as the backlash continues to grow, there are signs that Gutfeld’s approach may be alienating some viewers. The line between satire and personal attack can be a thin one, and many people feel that his comments about Biden—and other political figures—are starting to feel more like mockery than constructive commentary.

A Call for Responsibility in Political Discourse

The incident raises important questions about the state of political discourse in America. With tensions already high in the political landscape, many believe that figures like Gutfeld should be more mindful of the language they use, especially when it comes to public figures who continue to play significant roles in the national conversation. While humor has always been a powerful tool in politics, it can also serve to amplify division and perpetuate harmful stereotypes.

For those who feel that political figures—regardless of party affiliation—should be treated with respect, Gutfeld’s recent outburst serves as a reminder that we must be careful not to reduce public debates to personal attacks. While sharp commentary is a hallmark of late-night television, it’s crucial to strike a balance between satire and respectful discourse.

Conclusion: The Power of Words in Modern Media

As the controversy surrounding Gutfeld’s remarks continues to unfold, it highlights the larger issue of how media figures shape public opinion and influence political conversations. While Gutfeld’s style may continue to win over fans, the question remains whether such harsh language is the right approach in an era where division seems to be more prevalent than ever.

For now, Gutfeld’s segment on The Five will likely be remembered as a turning point in the conversation surrounding political commentary, with viewers divided over whether his approach was simply bad humor or a sign of something more troubling in the tone of today’s media. The incident has sparked necessary conversations about responsibility in political discourse and the potential harm of dehumanizing language in a polarized society.