Megyn Kelly stunned fans with a bold confession about her time at NBC, admitting she was “part of the problem” regarding the network’s handling of transgender issues. Reflecting on her past, Kelly criticized the media for its approach to the subject, particularly in how it dealt with children’s testimonies and medical treatments like puberty blockers. Her comments, which come after years of reflection, have sparked fresh debates about the role of media in shaping societal norms. What does this reveal about Kelly’s evolving views on media responsibility? You won’t believe what she said next!

Megyn Kelly Makes Jaw-Dropping Confession About Her Trans Coverage at NBC News

Megyn Kelly, a prominent voice in conservative media, shocked her fans with a candid confession regarding her time at NBC News, particularly her coverage of transgender issues. During a recent episode of her SiriusXM show, Kelly opened up about her role in how the media, including her former employer NBC, approached transgender topics during her time at the network.

A Confession of Accountability

“I worked at NBC. I was part of the problem while there,” Kelly admitted. Her statement struck a chord with many listeners, as she acknowledged that, although the media landscape had not yet been as dominated by discussions of transgender issues, she should have known better given the period. Kelly, who left NBC in 2018 following a highly controversial comment defending blackface as an appropriate Halloween costume, pointed out that the ideological explosion regarding transgender issues among children was just beginning to take shape.

But Kelly did not shy away from confronting the media’s role in amplifying these issues. “NBC has learned nothing,” she stated. “They’ve paid zero attention to the explosion of this ideology among children and the consequences, including the use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.” This confession speaks to a broader critique she has had of the way media outlets, including NBC, handled the growing conversation about gender identity.

A Defining Moment: 2018 Interview With a Transgender Family

One of the pivotal moments Kelly reflected on was her 2018 interview with a transgender girl and her family. The segment, which aired on NBC, was intended to showcase the family’s unconditional love and support for their child, but Kelly now admits she regrets the tone she set for the conversation. At the time, she framed it as a heartwarming story meant to inspire viewers to be more understanding and accepting.

In hindsight, Kelly said, “It’s all about affirming or you’re a bigot,” a sentiment she feels was too one-sided at the time. She pointed out that during her time at NBC, she was repeatedly urged by bosses to avoid biological language and instead use preferred pronouns when discussing transgender individuals. “NBC refused to use biological language. They only focused on preferred pronouns,” she criticized.

The Media’s Responsibility in Critical Coverage

In her recent remarks, Kelly has called out what she perceives as the media’s reluctance to ask critical questions or engage in deep, unbiased reporting when it comes to transgender issues—especially when it involves children. She’s pointed to the lack of rigorous journalistic investigation in areas like the impact of hormone therapy and the consequences of early gender transitions.

“I think the media should be cautious when dealing with stories about children and gender identity. There should be a more balanced, critical approach,” Kelly emphasized. Her growing unease with the media’s handling of these issues has become a central theme in her discussions, particularly as the conversation around transgender athletes competing in women’s sports has reached new levels of intensity.

The Nashville Tragedy: A Critical Missed Opportunity

A recent case that prompted Kelly to voice her frustrations was the tragic Nashville school shooting in 2023. Kelly sharply criticized how the media, including the police report, failed to discuss the transgender shooter’s gender identity struggles. In an emotional broadcast, she questioned why certain details, including the killer’s obsession with gender identity and racial animus, were left out of the conversation. She highlighted how these aspects were too controversial to touch upon for the mainstream media, yet she believes they are essential to understanding the factors that contributed to the tragedy.

“Why are these two things—gender identity and racial issues—too hot to touch?” she asked. “Why are we ignoring them in this case?” For Kelly, this was another example of the media’s failure to provide honest and transparent coverage on issues that deeply affect society.

The Growing Disconnect Between Media and Public Sentiment

Kelly’s remarks reflect a deepening disconnect between mainstream media and a significant portion of the public. As she reflects on her own role in the early days of covering transgender issues, it’s clear that Kelly has evolved in her views, recognizing that the push for inclusivity and sensitivity has sometimes left little room for honest, open dialogue.

For Kelly, this is a critical moment in her career, as she navigates the fine line between personal accountability and the responsibility she believes the media has to accurately and thoroughly cover important societal issues. With her background as a media professional and her outspoken advocacy for fair and balanced reporting, she is well-positioned to continue challenging the status quo, as well as inspiring her audience to think more critically about how the media covers sensitive issues like gender identity.

A Call for Honest Conversations

As Megyn Kelly continues her media career, her comments serve as a reminder of the need for transparency, fairness, and, above all, critical thinking. Whether it’s about transgender rights or broader societal issues, she believes that the media’s responsibility is to inform, not just affirm. And though her views might be controversial to some, they are part of a much-needed conversation about how we handle complex issues in the public eye.

In conclusion, Kelly’s bold reflections on her past and the media’s handling of transgender issues show that even established figures can evolve their perspectives. While her journey has not been without controversy, her commitment to driving conversations about fairness in reporting is more important than ever. As society continues to tackle complex issues, Kelly’s willingness to speak out serves as a call to action for more honest, open, and nuanced discussions across the media landscape.