Jason Whitlock is doubling down after Angel Reese won Sportswoman of the Year, criticizing both the award and her skillset. His blunt words about her game and recognition have sparked fierce debate—find out what he said that’s getting fans and analysts fired up! 👇👇

Jason Whitlock Says Angel Reese Was Named ‘Sportswoman of the Year’ To Annoy White People, Links WNBA Forward to L.A. Riots

Sports commentator Jason Whitlock has stirred controversy once again, this time regarding Angel Reese’s recent win as BET’s Sportswoman of the Year. Reese, who claimed the title for the second consecutive year and the third time overall, has faced significant backlash, with Whitlock leading the charge against what he perceives as an undeserving recognition. In a fiery and provocative rant, Whitlock argued that Reese’s award had little to do with her talent and more to do with her ability to “troll” white people, particularly white conservative men.

Whitlock’s Controversial Remarks on Angel Reese’s Award

In his latest episode of Fearless, Whitlock expressed his disdain for the award, calling Reese’s selection “an embarrassment to the WNBA.” He derided Reese’s skills, stating, “The woman with a retarded basketball game,” before adding, “She gets so much attention and is so incompetent.” Whitlock’s words were harsh and derogatory, as he continued to claim that Reese confirmed “every negative stereotype of women’s basketball” by gaining popularity without showcasing what he deems to be worthy skills.

Criticizing her game as “hot garbage” and “hot trash,” Whitlock suggested that Reese’s notoriety was built more on controversy than her actual performance. “She confirms almost every stereotype about women’s basketball,” he stated, implying that her rise to fame in the sport was due more to drama than athletic achievement.

A Racial Narrative and Trolling Claims

Whitlock didn’t stop at attacking Reese’s basketball ability—he also tied her recognition to a deeper racial narrative. He claimed that BET awarded Reese the honor because of her tendency to antagonize white people, particularly white Christian men and conservatives. He specifically pointed to her back-and-forth rivalry with Caitlin Clark, a fellow basketball star, which has sparked significant attention, especially after Reese’s memorable taunts during the NCAA championship game in 2023.

“She’s trolling white people,” Whitlock declared, suggesting that Reese’s rise in the public eye was less about her athleticism and more about stirring up controversy and creating division. Whitlock’s remarks seemed to echo a sentiment that Reese’s fame was not based on merit but rather on her ability to provoke people—especially those who might disagree with her outspoken nature or her unapologetic approach to her public persona.

Linking Reese to the L.A. Riots

Perhaps the most inflammatory part of Whitlock’s critique came when he drew an unexpected parallel between Reese and the 1992 Los Angeles riots. He implied that Reese’s actions were part of a broader societal pattern of intentionally angering white people, suggesting that her antagonistic behavior was somehow related to the unrest seen during the riots. This link, which many found outlandish and unsupported, served to amplify Whitlock’s racial narrative, connecting Reese’s public behavior to a much larger and more complex social issue.

A Divisive Figure: Praise for Clark, Criticism of Reese

Whitlock has been an outspoken critic of Angel Reese for much of her WNBA career, in stark contrast to his praise for Caitlin Clark. His preference for Clark, who he has often lauded for her skills and demeanor, stands in direct opposition to his perception of Reese’s behavior and abilities. While Whitlock’s commentary reflects his personal views, it has sparked a significant amount of debate, with many accusing him of undermining Reese’s accomplishments based on personal bias and divisive rhetoric.

Some have agreed with Whitlock’s assertion that Reese’s award may have been undeserved, suggesting that her rise to fame was more based on her media presence and controversies than her basketball performance. However, this viewpoint has drawn criticism, with others arguing that Reese’s on-court achievements and her ability to capture attention have played a major role in her success.

Backlash and Support for Reese

While Whitlock’s comments have certainly sparked controversy, there is a strong base of supporters for Angel Reese, who argue that her talents and leadership deserve recognition. Many point to Reese’s accomplishments as a key reason for her awards, noting that she’s been a force in both college basketball and the WNBA. Additionally, Reese’s advocacy for social issues and her openness about navigating the complexities of being a public figure have earned her admiration from fans and colleagues alike.

Whitlock’s attack on Reese comes in the wake of similar criticism from other prominent figures, including boxer Claressa Shields, who voiced her displeasure with Reese’s recognition, questioning whether it was truly earned. As the debate rages on, the conversation about Reese’s place in sports and her impact on the media landscape continues to divide opinions.

Conclusion: The Polarizing Legacy of Angel Reese

The controversy surrounding Angel Reese’s Sportswoman of the Year award and the resulting criticisms from figures like Jason Whitlock highlight the deep divisions that exist in the sports world today. While Reese’s critics claim that her recognition is undeserved, her supporters argue that her achievements on the court and her outspoken nature have helped bring attention to important issues in sports.

As the WNBA season continues and Reese’s career progresses, the debate about her place in the sport will undoubtedly persist. Whether or not she continues to receive the accolades she’s earned, one thing is certain: Angel Reese remains a polarizing figure who has sparked important conversations about race, representation, and merit in sports.