The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has called on President Trump to reverse his decision to nominate Jeanine Pirro as acting U.S. attorney for D.C. due to her controversial history of anti-Muslim remarks. The nomination has ignited a storm of backlash, questioning her fitness for such a crucial position. Could this appointment trigger a nationwide debate on bias in law enforcement? Get the full details here!

CAIR Urges Trump to Revoke Jeanine Pirro’s Appointment as Acting U.S. Attorney for D.C. Due to Anti-Muslim Record

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the leading civil rights and advocacy organization for Muslims in the United States, is demanding that President Donald Trump rescind his appointment of Jeanine Pirro as acting U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., calling her a “dangerous” choice due to her longstanding history of anti-Muslim rhetoric.

Pirro, a prominent Fox News host and former district attorney, was named by Trump to oversee the District of Columbia’s prosecutorial office—a role that is one of the most significant in the U.S. legal system. But CAIR is raising serious concerns about Pirro’s ability to serve impartially, citing her past comments that have been widely condemned as Islamophobic.

Pirro’s Anti-Muslim Rhetoric

The controversy surrounding Pirro has been building for years, largely due to her remarks about Muslims, Islam, and political figures like Representative Ilhan Omar. In 2019, Pirro questioned Omar’s patriotism, suggesting that the congresswoman’s decision to wear a hijab meant she opposed the U.S. Constitution. “Think about it,” Pirro said at the time. “Omar wears a hijab… Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?”

Pirro’s comments sparked outrage, leading CAIR to call for a boycott of Fox News and prompting several advertisers to pull their support from her show. Though Pirro was suspended for three weeks and Fox News issued a condemnation of her remarks, she did not apologize for her statements. Her repeated use of her platform to spread misinformation about Islam and Muslims has contributed to a culture of Islamophobia in the U.S., according to CAIR.

CAIR’s Demand for Rescission of Appointment

CAIR’s opposition to Pirro’s appointment stems from her track record of using her media platform to promote divisive and harmful stereotypes about Muslims. In a statement, CAIR’s executive director, Nihad Awad, called Pirro’s nomination “a slap in the face” to Muslim Americans and other minority communities. “Jeanine Pirro has built a career on demonizing Muslims and spreading falsehoods about Islam,” Awad said. “Her appointment as U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. undermines the very principles of justice and equality upon which this country is built.”

The organization is calling on President Trump to immediately rescind Pirro’s appointment and to select a candidate who can serve without bias or prejudice. “The role of U.S. Attorney demands an individual who upholds the rule of law and treats all Americans equally, regardless of their religion or background,” Awad continued. “Pirro’s history of bigotry disqualifies her from this important position.”

Pirro’s Controversial Record at Fox News

Pirro’s tenure at Fox News has been marked by her outspoken political views, which often align with the far-right wing of the American political spectrum. In addition to her Islamophobic remarks, Pirro has been an ardent supporter of President Trump, frequently defending his policies and rhetoric. Her support for Trump and his controversial stances on immigration, race, and national security have further cemented her place as a polarizing figure in American media.

Her recent appointment to such a high-ranking legal position has raised eyebrows, particularly among critics who worry that her political views may influence her ability to serve impartially in the Department of Justice. Some believe her outspoken partisanship could cloud her judgment in high-profile legal matters, especially those involving minority communities.

A Call for Accountability

As CAIR continues to advocate for the revocation of Pirro’s appointment, the organization is also urging the public to hold government officials accountable for decisions that impact marginalized communities. “We must ensure that our justice system is fair and equitable for all,” said Awad. “Appointing someone like Jeanine Pirro, who has demonstrated a blatant disregard for Muslim Americans, sends the wrong message.”

As the debate over Pirro’s appointment continues, the question remains: Can someone with a record of inflammatory rhetoric and divisive political views serve in such an influential position without undermining public trust in the legal system? CAIR believes that the answer is no, and it is calling on President Trump to reconsider his decision before the damage to public trust grows deeper.

Conclusion

The controversy surrounding Jeanine Pirro’s appointment as acting U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. raises critical questions about fairness, accountability, and bias in the U.S. legal system. With a history of Islamophobic rhetoric and inflammatory comments about Muslims, Pirro’s appointment has sparked widespread opposition, particularly from civil rights organizations like CAIR. As the debate unfolds, it’s clear that this is not just about one individual—it’s about ensuring that the justice system remains fair and impartial for all Americans, regardless of their religion or background.