SHOCKING REVEAL: LESLEY STAHL STRIKES BACK AGAINST SHARI REDSTONE—A 25 MILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT AND A PLAN TO TAKE CONTROL OF CBS! Lesley Stahl is fighting back in a major way. As President Trump demands millions and an apology from CBS, Stahl, seething with anger, is pushing back against Shari Redstone’s leadership. Stahl reveals her plan to take control of the network’s future and challenges Redstone’s authority in this explosive showdown. What’s at stake for CBS? The power struggle is about to reach its boiling point!

In a shocking and candid interview, CBS veteran reporter Lesley Stahl admitted she was “angry” with Paramount Global Chairwoman Shari Redstone over the network’s handling of President Donald Trump’s multimillion-dollar lawsuit.

The ongoing legal battle between Trump and CBS News has gripped the media world, with high-profile figures like Stahl speaking out about the pressure being put on the newsroom and the apparent corporate interference that could threaten the integrity of journalism.

In an emotional interview on The New Yorker Radio Hour, Stahl, who has been with CBS for over four decades, opened up about the lawsuit and its ripple effects, which have sent shockwaves through the network. Trump is demanding at least $25 million in damages and an apology, but it’s not just about money—it’s about control.

Stahl did not hold back, expressing her frustration at the way corporate interests have influenced editorial decisions at CBS. For a journalist who has prided herself on delivering hard-hitting investigative reporting, seeing the network bow to corporate pressure was nothing short of a betrayal.

“It steps on the First Amendment. It steps on the freedom of the press,” Stahl said, her voice heavy with emotion. “It makes me question whether any corporation should own a news operation. It’s very disconcerting.”

The Lawsuit That Sparked the Drama: Trump’s Battle with CBS

The entire drama began after the infamous 60 Minutes interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris aired in the final weeks leading up to the 2020 presidential election.

The exchange between Harris and CBS correspondent Bill Whitaker was nothing short of awkward. Whitaker asked Harris why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wasn’t “listening” to the Biden administration, and Harris’ response, which critics dubbed a “word salad,” quickly became a target for mockery.

However, when the same question aired in its entirety on CBS’s primetime special, Harris provided a much more concise and controlled answer.

Critics immediately accused CBS of editing the interview to shield Harris from criticism. Allegedly, the network edited the footage to make Harris look more polished and less vulnerable ahead of the election, a move that sparked outrage among Trump’s team, who claimed that CBS had interfered with the election process.

In the wake of this, Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against CBS News and its parent company, Paramount Global. Since then, the lawsuit has ballooned to $20 billion, with Trump demanding not only financial compensation but also a public apology from the network. The legal action accuses CBS of deceitfully editing the interview with Harris to favor the Democratic nominee, while painting Trump and his campaign in a negative light.

The allegations have led to a fierce legal battle, with Trump’s legal team accusing the network of deliberately trying to influence the 2020 election by manipulating the narrative in favor of Harris. “The network was trying to protect its preferred political candidate and bury the truth,” Trump’s lawyers argued in the court filing.

Lesley Stahl’s Anger: “It Makes Me Question Everything”

As one of CBS’s most respected journalists, Lesley Stahl’s feelings about the lawsuit are particularly significant. For decades, Stahl has been a fixture in American journalism, known for her tough, no-nonsense approach to interviews. Yet, the ongoing lawsuit has left her disillusioned with the network she’s called home for so long.

In her interview with The New Yorker Radio Hour, Stahl admitted she was “angry” at Shari Redstone for allowing corporate interests to influence editorial decisions at CBS. “I’m angry because I’ve worked my whole career in a newsroom where we prided ourselves on telling the truth—no matter who it hurt, no matter who we angered. And now? Now, there’s this pressure from the top,” Stahl said. “We’re being told by a corporation, ‘Do this, do that with your story, change this, don’t run that piece.’ It feels like the very foundation of what we stand for is being threatened.”

The network’s handling of the lawsuit and its relationship with the Trump administration have raised alarms for Stahl and many of her colleagues. She recounted the resignation of 60 Minutes producer Bill Owens, who stepped down after claiming that the network was preventing him from pursuing certain stories.

“That was painful. It wasn’t just Bill leaving—it was the realization that something was fundamentally wrong in how we were being asked to operate,” Stahl confessed.

Despite the immense pressure, Stahl refused to sugarcoat her feelings, calling out the corporate meddling that has tainted the network’s commitment to journalism. “It’s hard for me to sit here and watch my own network buckle under pressure,” she said. “This is not how we should be operating. The public needs a free press that can report without fear or favor. And right now, I feel like we’re failing them.”

The Pressure on CBS: The Aftermath of Owens’ Resignation

As Stahl spoke out about the effects of the Trump lawsuit on CBS, she also hinted at the internal turmoil within the network. The resignation of Bill Owens was just one in a series of troubling departures from CBS News. Wendy McMahon, CBS News’ president, also resigned abruptly, leaving many within the newsroom feeling unsettled and disillusioned.

Stahl described the situation at CBS as “hard” and said that many of her colleagues had considered leaving “en masse” after Owens’ departure. The internal friction, coupled with the public scrutiny over the Trump lawsuit, has created a fragile atmosphere at the network. Journalists who have built their careers on the promise of integrity are now questioning the very foundation of their work.

“There’s a sense of fragility in the press right now,” Stahl said. “When we’re faced with a frivolous lawsuit, it’s not just about the money—it’s about the trust that the public places in us. And I’m worried that we’re losing that trust. The public doesn’t seem to appreciate the importance of a free, strong, and tough press. But we’re the ones who hold power accountable. We’re the ones who make sure the system stays clean.

The Bigger Picture: Corporate Pressure and the First Amendment

For Stahl, the Trump lawsuit is a symptom of a much larger issue in the media landscape—corporate pressure that compromises journalistic integrity. “To have a news organization come under corporate pressure? To have the people in charge of the network telling us how to handle stories? That steps on the First Amendment,” Stahl said with palpable frustration. “It makes me question whether any corporation should own a news operation. Maybe it’s time to rethink everything.”

Her comments reflect a growing concern among journalists and media professionals who feel increasingly constrained by corporate interests. As the media landscape continues to evolve, many are wondering how much control corporations should have over the content that is presented to the public.

For Stahl, the issue isn’t just about corporate interference—it’s about the very heart of journalism and the vital role it plays in holding those in power accountable.

The Impact of the Lawsuit: A Threat to Media Freedom

The fallout from Trump’s lawsuit has already begun to shape the media landscape. With the lawsuit looming over CBS News, the network is facing difficult questions about its role in the election and its relationship with powerful figures like Trump. Many fear that the lawsuit will set a dangerous precedent for media outlets, allowing politicians to manipulate the narrative and intimidate journalists into self-censorship.

“The thing that pains me most,” Stahl said, “is that the press is supposed to be a check on power, not a tool of power. And right now, it feels like we’re being used as a punching bag in someone’s political agenda.”

As the lawsuit drags on, CBS News is left grappling with its future. Will the network continue to stand strong in the face of pressure, or will it buckle under the weight of corporate interests? The answer to that question will shape the future of journalism in America.

The Road Ahead: A Question of Integrity

Lesley Stahl’s comments serve as a stark reminder of the challenges facing the media in the current political climate. The Trump lawsuit is not just a legal battle—it is a test of the media’s ability to maintain its independence and integrity in the face of external pressures.

As the situation continues to unfold, Stahl and her colleagues at CBS are left grappling with difficult questions about the future of the press and their role in preserving the freedom to report the truth.

“The public needs us now more than ever,” Stahl concluded. “We can’t let corporate pressure, or any pressure, compromise the truth. If we do, we risk losing everything we stand for.”