Greg Gutfeld and Tyrus Laugh Off Terry Moran’s Firing: The Fallout and Backlash in Media and Politics

The firing of veteran journalist Terry Moran by ABC News has set the media world on fire, with reactions ranging from support for his freedom of speech to criticism about the network’s stance on neutrality. However, among the most provocative responses have come from Fox News personalities Greg Gutfeld and Tyrus, who have made no effort to hide their disdain for both Moran’s firing and the culture of political correctness that they believe led to his termination.

In a series of public comments that have quickly gone viral, Gutfeld and Tyrus mocked the very notion of journalistic objectivity and laughed off the network’s decision to part ways with Moran. But their attacks on Moran have raised questions about the role of media figures in the broader conversation about the intersection of journalism, politics, and corporate control.

The Incident: Moran’s Firing and the Political Backlash

Terry Moran, a long-time correspondent for ABC News, was dismissed after posting a critical social media message about President Donald Trump and his Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. Moran’s post, which referred to Miller as a “world-class hater” and Trump as a “world-class hater,” was immediately deleted but quickly caught the attention of both political figures and the public. ABC News, citing the need for neutrality and professionalism, decided to suspend and later fire Moran, citing the violation of their company’s standards of objectivity.

While this decision was justified by ABC as necessary to preserve journalistic integrity, the move quickly attracted both support and backlash. Many hailed it as an overreach by the network, accusing ABC of silencing one of its top reporters simply because he expressed his personal opinions. Others defended the decision, insisting that journalists should remain impartial, especially when commenting on political figures or events.

Greg Gutfeld and Tyrus Take Aim at Moran and ABC

Among the loudest voices in Moran’s defense—and in the broader critique of ABC’s decision—were Fox News personalities Greg Gutfeld and Tyrus. Both individuals, known for their bold and often irreverent takes on current events, wasted no time in mocking both Moran’s firing and the network’s decision to penalize him for his social media post.

Gutfeld’s Laughter and Contempt

On his show Gutfeld!, Greg Gutfeld dismissed the firing of Moran as “stupid” and unnecessary. Gutfeld, who has built a career on mocking both the political establishment and the media, was quick to call out ABC for being hypocritical in its attempt to maintain neutrality while simultaneously allowing hosts on other networks, including Fox News, to regularly express their opinions—often in much harsher terms.

“So stupid. No, for God’s sake,” Gutfeld said during a podcast segment. “Literally, every day on Fox News, they’re taking stuff out of context, or their people are saying utterly vicious things about Democratic politicians. The entire thing is because ABC clings to this facade that they somehow exist in a bubble outside all of this. It’s a joke. They’re a f***ing joke.”

Gutfeld’s scathing remarks were delivered with his characteristic sarcasm, and they resonated with many who felt that Moran’s firing was the result of corporate media’s fear of upsetting political leaders. His comments about ABC’s alleged hypocrisy not only undermined the network’s decision to fire Moran but also set the stage for a broader conversation about the growing influence of political pressure on journalistic standards.

Tyrus Joins the Attack: A Call for Freedom of Expression

Tyrus, former professional wrestler and Fox News contributor, added fuel to the fire with his own take on Moran’s termination. Known for his blunt and often controversial opinions, Tyrus didn’t mince words in his defense of Moran and his critique of ABC News.

“It’s all about corporate pressure,” Tyrus said in an interview. “They’re afraid of rocking the boat. Well, too bad. You can’t silence people just because they speak the truth. If ABC wants to be in bed with politics, then they’re no better than the politicians they’re supposed to be reporting on.”

Tyrus’ comments underscore the growing divide between the media and its audience—especially when it comes to political and corporate influence. According to Tyrus, the media is becoming more beholden to its corporate interests and political affiliations, and this is eroding the integrity of independent journalism. In Tyrus’ eyes, Moran’s firing isn’t just a personal tragedy for the journalist—it’s a broader reflection of the industry’s inability to allow its employees to express themselves without fear of professional consequences.

The Bigger Debate: Journalism, Politics, and Corporate Interests

The scorn aimed at ABC News by Gutfeld and Tyrus speaks to a larger conversation about the role of journalists in today’s highly polarized political environment. On one side, there are those who argue that journalists must remain neutral in their reporting, avoiding personal opinions that could influence public perception. On the other side, however, there are those who believe that journalists have the right—and, in some cases, the responsibility—to express their personal views, especially when they feel that those views reflect a larger truth about the political and social climate.

In the case of Moran, this debate was particularly charged because his comments were made in a personal capacity, on social media, and were not intended to reflect the views of ABC News. However, the network’s decision to discipline him raises questions about where the line should be drawn between personal expression and professional responsibility.

This ongoing tension between corporate interests, journalistic freedom, and political pressures is only growing as the media landscape becomes more fragmented. Journalists at mainstream news outlets like ABC News and Fox News are increasingly finding themselves caught between the need to be transparent, fair, and impartial, and the desire to speak their minds freely on the issues that matter most.

The Fallout: Public Opinion and Corporate Responsibility

The immediate aftermath of Moran’s firing sparked intense public reactions. Social media exploded with comments both supporting and criticizing the decision. Many people agreed with Gutfeld and Tyrus, seeing Moran’s firing as an overreaction to a simple, personal opinion shared by a respected journalist. Others, however, saw it as an example of how modern media outlets are increasingly reluctant to allow their employees to take sides on controversial issues for fear of alienating audiences or political leaders.

For some, Moran’s firing was seen as a necessary step to preserve the neutrality and objectivity that they believe are essential to journalism. For others, it was a dangerous move that set a precedent for silencing independent voices in the media.

The irony, of course, is that in this instance, Moran was defending his right to speak freely, and his firing only further fueled the debate about the erosion of free speech in the media.

The Future of Journalism: Will Independent Voices Be Silenced?

As the controversy surrounding Terry Moran’s firing continues to unfold, the broader implications for the future of journalism are becoming clearer. In an age where corporate interests and political affiliations are increasingly shaping news coverage, many are wondering whether the media will continue to be a space for open and honest debate, or whether it will become increasingly restricted to mainstream narratives that align with corporate and political interests.

Moran’s departure from ABC News highlights the growing pressures on journalists to maintain political neutrality while balancing their own personal beliefs and professional responsibilities. As more and more media outlets become intertwined with corporate and political agendas, it’s becoming harder for journalists to maintain their objectivity.

In the coming months and years, we may see more and more journalists leave traditional media organizations for independent platforms, where they can freely express their opinions and engage with their audiences without the constraints of corporate media policies. Moran’s own shift toward independent journalism may signal the beginning of a larger movement, where journalists reclaim their voices and influence outside of corporate control.

Conclusion: A Turning Point for the Media

Jon Stewart’s sharp critique of ABC, combined with the backlash from Gutfeld, Tyrus, and others, underscores a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle for media independence and journalistic integrity. While Moran’s firing may seem like an isolated incident, it reflects the larger issues that journalists face today—pressures to conform, political influences, and the growing divide between mainstream media and independent voices.

As the media landscape evolves, the question of where to draw the line between professional conduct and personal expression will remain at the forefront of the conversation. Moran’s story is not just about one journalist—it’s about the future of journalism itself, and how the industry responds to the shifting pressures of politics, media consolidation, and the demands of a modern, polarized audience.

In the end, Moran’s firing is a sobering reminder that the media industry must reconcile its commitment to impartiality with its duty to protect free speech. The future of journalism depends on how media organizations handle these tensions and whether they can provide a platform for independent voices to thrive without fear of corporate or political interference.