Whoopi Goldberg has reportedly implored Karoline Leavitt to drop her $800 million defamation lawsuit against the daytime talk show, “The View,” sources familiar with the matter have revealed. The legal action stems from alleged character assassination and defamatory statements made by the show’s hosts regarding Leavitt, a conservative commentator and political strategist.

The lawsuit has reportedly sent shockwaves through ABC, the network airing “The View,” prompting internal discussions and attempts at a settlement. Insiders suggest a potential reckoning is underway for the long-running program, which has often been criticized for its perceived bias and treatment of conservative viewpoints.

Leavitt’s legal team alleges that the hosts of “The View” engaged in a campaign of disparagement, attributing her success to privilege and “wokeness” rather than merit. The lawsuit contends that these statements, and others, caused significant damage to Leavitt’s reputation and career prospects.

Goldberg, along with co-host Joy Behar, are reportedly at the forefront of settlement negotiations, signaling a growing concern over the potential legal and financial repercussions of the suit. The potential $800 million payout represents a considerable financial burden for the network and raises questions about the long-term viability of the show.

The lawsuit has ignited a firestorm online, with Leavitt garnering significant support from conservative circles. Critics of “The View” argue that the legal action serves as a crucial reminder that media personalities are accountable for the words they speak and the impact they have on individuals.

ABC executives are reportedly weighing various options, including potential exit strategies for key personnel and even the possibility of canceling the show altogether. Advertisers are also said to be closely monitoring the situation, expressing nervousness about the potential brand damage associated with the controversy.

Leavitt has maintained that her lawsuit is about more than just personal grievances. She aims to send a clear message about accountability in media and to ensure that reputations are not unjustly damaged without consequence. Her legal battle has resonated with other conservative voices who claim to have experienced similar unfair treatment, suggesting a potential shift in the media landscape moving forward. The case remains ongoing, with further developments expected in the coming weeks.