Riley Gaines and Simone Biles Clash Over Inclusion of Men in Women’s Sports
June 9, 2025 — The Debate Over Fairness and Inclusion Continues to Intensify
A fresh and fiery social media feud has erupted between former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines and Olympic gymnast Simone Biles, igniting a passionate debate over the inclusion of transgender athletes in women’s sports. The issue was sparked when Gaines criticized a high school softball team for fielding a male athlete in a girls’ competition, and Biles swiftly responded with a scathing rebuttal that has sent shockwaves through the sports community.
The Initial Disagreement: Gaines Takes Aim at the Softball Championship
The controversy began when the Minnesota State High School League announced Champlin Park as the 2025 AAAA Softball State Champion via X (formerly Twitter). Gaines, known for her outspoken views on women’s sports, quickly reposted the tweet with a comment: “Comments off lol. To be expected when your star player is a boy.”
Gaines’ comment was directed at the high school’s star player, a boy who was participating in a girls’ competition. The tweet quickly gained traction, with supporters backing her stance that biological males should not be competing in women’s sports. However, her statement didn’t sit well with everyone, especially Olympic gold medalist Simone Biles.
Simone Biles Responds: “Truly Sick” and “Sore Loser”
Biles, who has long been a vocal advocate for inclusion and equal opportunities for all athletes, did not hesitate to respond to Gaines. In a fiery post of her own, Biles called Gaines “truly sick” and a “sore loser” for her stance. “@Riley_Gaines_ You’re truly sick, all of this campaigning because you lost a race. Straight up sore loser,” Biles tweeted, accusing Gaines of being driven by personal bitterness rather than a genuine concern for fairness in sports.
Biles’ statement didn’t stop there. She continued with a more pointed attack, suggesting that instead of condemning the inclusion of transgender athletes, Gaines should focus on promoting inclusivity: “You should be uplifting the trans community and perhaps finding a way to make sports inclusive OR creating a new avenue where trans feel safe in sports. Maybe a transgender category IN ALL sports!! But instead… You bully them…”
Biles also added, “One things for sure is no one in sports is safe with you around!!!!!” These words caused a stir in the sports world, as Biles’ reputation as one of the most successful and decorated athletes in Olympic history was now being used to advocate for a more inclusive approach to transgender participation in sports.
Gaines’ Retort: “Men Don’t Belong in Women’s Sports”
Gaines, never one to shy away from controversy, fired back with a sharp reply that further amplified the tension between the two athletes. “This is actually so disappointing,” Gaines tweeted. “It’s not my job or the job of any woman to figure out how to include men in our spaces. You can uplift men stealing championships in women’s sports with YOUR platform. Men don’t belong in women’s sports and I say that with my full chest.”
Her response reinforced her long-standing position that biological males should not be allowed to compete in female sports. Gaines has made this issue a core part of her advocacy and platform, often voicing concerns about fairness in competition and what she sees as the erasure of women’s achievements in sports.
Public Reaction: A Polarizing Debate
As expected, the exchange between Gaines and Biles sparked intense reactions from the sports world and beyond. #StandWithRileyGaines and #SupportSimoneBiles quickly trended on social media, with fans taking sides in the increasingly polarized debate.
Some fans rallied behind Gaines, citing her concerns about fairness in women’s sports and the need to protect opportunities for biological women. “It’s simple—if you’re biologically male, you shouldn’t compete in women’s sports,” one supporter posted.
Others sided with Biles, supporting her call for inclusion and emphasizing the importance of ensuring equal rights for transgender athletes. “Simone is right, we need to find ways to make sports inclusive for everyone. Trans athletes should not be marginalized,” another fan commented.
Several prominent figures in sports have weighed in on the debate, with some agreeing with Gaines and others defending Biles’ stance. Former tennis player Martina Navratilova, a long-time advocate for equality in sports, expressed a nuanced opinion, suggesting that the conversation should be focused on finding ways to ensure fairness while also respecting the rights of transgender athletes.
The Broader Impact: What This Means for Women’s Sports
This latest exchange between Gaines and Biles has brought the issue of transgender athletes in women’s sports into the forefront once again. With growing concerns about the fairness of competition, and the increasing visibility of athletes like Gaines and Biles, this debate is far from over.
For many, this issue transcends sports—it’s about the values of fairness, inclusion, and equality. While both sides of the debate make compelling arguments, it’s clear that a resolution that satisfies everyone may be difficult to achieve.
The impact of this conversation extends beyond the WNBA and into every professional sports league, and it’s shaping how future generations of athletes, both cisgender and transgender, will experience competition. The outcome of this discourse will likely have lasting effects on the policies that govern sports participation for years to come.
As the debate continues to unfold, one thing is certain: athletes like Riley Gaines and Simone Biles are setting the stage for the future of sports in a world where inclusivity and fairness are more important than ever.
News
My MIL Poured Tea on Me and Served Divorce Papers at Sunday Dinner. “Jake Needs Someone Better”
Part One The iced tea slid over the lip of the cut-crystal pitcher in a thick amber sheet and fell…
“LEAKS OR SMEAR? ‘JAZZY’ CROCKETT FACES ANONYMOUS ACCUSATIONS—BUT WHERE ARE THE RECEIPTS?” Producers say unnamed assistants painted a harsh picture: off‑camera lounging, on‑demand rides, and a red‑carpet attitude. It’s spicy, sure—but none of it is on the record, and no messages, emails, or logs have surfaced to back it up. Is this a genuine HR nightmare or just political theater engineered for clicks? We pulled the claims, chased the paper trail, and noted who declined to comment. Judge the story—not just the sound bites.
A Storm on Capitol Hill In the high-stakes arena of U.S. politics, where every move is scrutinized and every word…
SILENCE AT THE ED SULLIVAN THEATER—AND A THOUSAND THEORIES BY DAWN. For the first time in ages, The Late Show goes dark with no on‑air drumroll, and the questions write themselves. Is CBS quietly fast‑tracking an exit, testing a replacement, or staging a headline‑grabbing reset that only works if nobody sees it coming? The audience can smell when something’s off, and this week feels like a chess move, not a calendar break. If Colbert is staying, why the hush? If he’s not, why the cliffhanger? One empty week has become the loudest story in late‑night, and what happens next could redraw the map for every show that follows. Buckle up—the quiet week might be the plot twist.
Stephen Colbert Heads Into Summer Break Stephen Colbert has officially begun his annual summer hiatus from The Late Show with…
“BOOS. WHISPERS. THEN: ‘SHUT UP.’ KELLY RIPA’S ON‑AIR SNAP—AND MARK CONSUELOS’ QUICK SAVE.” What started as a simple back‑and‑forth turned suddenly combative when a viewer pushed back and Kelly snapped. The crowd answered with a chorus of whispers and boos, and the tension practically hummed—until Mark stepped in, defused the moment, and gave everyone a way out. Is this the cost of speaking your mind in real time, or a host losing patience on a hot morning? The debate’s raging; the video tells its own story.
A Morning Show Takes an Unexpected Turn On Wednesday, August 13, 2025, millions of viewers tuned into ABC’s Live with…
“NO WORDS, JUST A WALK — INSIDE THE 30 SECONDS THAT REWROTE KELLY CLARKSON’S LIVE SEGMENT AND LEFT NBC REELING” A smile, a playful bit, and then the air changed. Kelly Clarkson’s expression went still; Jenna Bush Hager kept talking, unaware the moment had shifted until Kelly stood, slipped past Camera 2, and exited without a word. In the control room: headset chatter, a hard cut, and a scramble to fill the gap. Online, the forensic rewinds began instantly: Which question crossed the line? What was said off‑camera just before the turn? And what does a silent exit communicate that a speech never could? This wasn’t drama for drama’s sake—it felt like a boundary drawn in permanent ink. Watch the viral clip, the angles you didn’t see, and the context that explains the quiet storm 👇
Silence Louder Than Words: Kelly Clarkson’s Calm Walk-Off Stuns Live TV and Puts NBC on Notice It happened without shouting….
MONDAY NIGHT WON’T BE A FAREWELL—IT’LL BE A MUTINY. They weren’t meant to share a stage, let alone a cause. But after CBS axed Colbert—days after he mocked a mega‑deal—late‑night’s rivals are turning into co‑conspirators. No sanitized monologues, no polite handoffs—just a cross‑network show of force that could redraw the rules of TV after dark. So who’s pulling the strings, what’s the plan, and how far are they willing to go? Everything we know is in the comments 👇
Colbert’s Exit Sparks Late-Night Revolt: Fallon, Kimmel, Meyers, and Oliver Plan Historic Stand Stephen Colbert’s abrupt removal from The Late…
End of content
No more pages to load
