Elon Musk Sues Joy Behar and ‘The View’ for Defamation, Demanding $70 Million in Damages
Los Angeles, CA – In a high-profile escalation that has captured national attention, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has filed a defamation lawsuit against Joy Behar, co-host of ABC’s popular daytime talk show, “The View,” as well as the show’s producers, seeking $70 million in damages. Filed on March 20, 2025, in a California court, Musk’s lawsuit accuses Behar and the program of spreading “false and malicious” statements that allegedly harmed his reputation, both personally and professionally. This legal clash between Musk, one of the world’s most influential tech innovators, and Behar, a prominent figure in American television, has sparked intense debate about free speech and media responsibility.
The lawsuit centers on remarks made by Behar during a recent episode of “The View,” where she described Musk as “pro-apartheid” and an “enemy of the United States,” criticizing his increasing influence on politics and business. In the segment, Behar discussed Musk’s South African upbringing, claiming, “He was born under apartheid in South Africa, so he has that mentality going on—he was pro-apartheid, as I understand it.” Musk’s legal team strongly disputes these allegations, emphasizing Behar’s own uncertainty, as she later admitted, “I don’t really know for sure if he was,” before humorously adding, “So don’t be suing me, okay, Elon?”
Despite this on-air disclaimer, Musk’s attorneys argue that Behar’s original statements were both reckless and intentionally harmful. Given the show’s substantial viewership, they assert that these comments unfairly portrayed Musk as a racist and un-American figure, causing measurable damage to his businesses, including Tesla, SpaceX, and X Corp. “Ms. Behar and ‘The View’ knowingly broadcast falsehoods to millions, accusing Mr. Musk of supporting a racist regime and threatening American values—accusations that are unequivocally false,” the lawsuit states. “This was no slip-up; it was a calculated attack.”
Musk, born in Pretoria, South Africa, in 1971, has previously addressed his upbringing during the apartheid era, clarifying he left at 17 to study in Canada and later became a naturalized U.S. citizen. He has consistently denied supporting apartheid, with his mother, Maye Musk, publicly noting on social media that openly opposing apartheid at the time could result in imprisonment, indicating a nuanced and challenging environment. Musk’s lawsuit stresses these historical complexities, accusing Behar of oversimplifying and falsifying his past for dramatic effect.
The lawsuit has generated intense reactions online. Musk’s supporters have flooded social media, defending his stance and urging him to hold media figures accountable. Conversely, critics argue the lawsuit threatens free speech, characterizing Behar’s comments as opinion rather than defamation. Legal experts suggest the court’s decision will depend heavily on whether Behar’s comments are deemed protected opinion or presented as factual assertions.
For Behar and ABC, this lawsuit represents a significant challenge. Known for her bold commentary, the 82-year-old comedian has faced controversies before, yet the financial stakes and Musk’s considerable resources elevate the risk. Sources close to “The View” indicate that producers and legal advisors are preparing a vigorous defense, likely highlighting Behar’s subsequent on-air clarification as mitigating evidence.
Elon Musk, familiar with contentious public feuds, appears committed to pushing forward aggressively. His $70 million claim is as symbolic as it is financial, signaling his frustration with media narratives he views as unfair and harmful. “They are lying about me,” Musk reportedly remarked, highlighting his ongoing conflicts with media portrayals.
The coming legal battle promises to be a high-stakes courtroom drama, scrutinizing the boundaries of televised commentary, the responsibilities of public figures, and the complexities of free speech in America. As proceedings begin in the upcoming weeks, the nation—and indeed the world—will be closely watching this landmark defamation case unfold.
News
My MIL Poured Tea on Me and Served Divorce Papers at Sunday Dinner. “Jake Needs Someone Better”
Part One The iced tea slid over the lip of the cut-crystal pitcher in a thick amber sheet and fell…
“LEAKS OR SMEAR? ‘JAZZY’ CROCKETT FACES ANONYMOUS ACCUSATIONS—BUT WHERE ARE THE RECEIPTS?” Producers say unnamed assistants painted a harsh picture: off‑camera lounging, on‑demand rides, and a red‑carpet attitude. It’s spicy, sure—but none of it is on the record, and no messages, emails, or logs have surfaced to back it up. Is this a genuine HR nightmare or just political theater engineered for clicks? We pulled the claims, chased the paper trail, and noted who declined to comment. Judge the story—not just the sound bites.
A Storm on Capitol Hill In the high-stakes arena of U.S. politics, where every move is scrutinized and every word…
SILENCE AT THE ED SULLIVAN THEATER—AND A THOUSAND THEORIES BY DAWN. For the first time in ages, The Late Show goes dark with no on‑air drumroll, and the questions write themselves. Is CBS quietly fast‑tracking an exit, testing a replacement, or staging a headline‑grabbing reset that only works if nobody sees it coming? The audience can smell when something’s off, and this week feels like a chess move, not a calendar break. If Colbert is staying, why the hush? If he’s not, why the cliffhanger? One empty week has become the loudest story in late‑night, and what happens next could redraw the map for every show that follows. Buckle up—the quiet week might be the plot twist.
Stephen Colbert Heads Into Summer Break Stephen Colbert has officially begun his annual summer hiatus from The Late Show with…
“BOOS. WHISPERS. THEN: ‘SHUT UP.’ KELLY RIPA’S ON‑AIR SNAP—AND MARK CONSUELOS’ QUICK SAVE.” What started as a simple back‑and‑forth turned suddenly combative when a viewer pushed back and Kelly snapped. The crowd answered with a chorus of whispers and boos, and the tension practically hummed—until Mark stepped in, defused the moment, and gave everyone a way out. Is this the cost of speaking your mind in real time, or a host losing patience on a hot morning? The debate’s raging; the video tells its own story.
A Morning Show Takes an Unexpected Turn On Wednesday, August 13, 2025, millions of viewers tuned into ABC’s Live with…
“NO WORDS, JUST A WALK — INSIDE THE 30 SECONDS THAT REWROTE KELLY CLARKSON’S LIVE SEGMENT AND LEFT NBC REELING” A smile, a playful bit, and then the air changed. Kelly Clarkson’s expression went still; Jenna Bush Hager kept talking, unaware the moment had shifted until Kelly stood, slipped past Camera 2, and exited without a word. In the control room: headset chatter, a hard cut, and a scramble to fill the gap. Online, the forensic rewinds began instantly: Which question crossed the line? What was said off‑camera just before the turn? And what does a silent exit communicate that a speech never could? This wasn’t drama for drama’s sake—it felt like a boundary drawn in permanent ink. Watch the viral clip, the angles you didn’t see, and the context that explains the quiet storm 👇
Silence Louder Than Words: Kelly Clarkson’s Calm Walk-Off Stuns Live TV and Puts NBC on Notice It happened without shouting….
MONDAY NIGHT WON’T BE A FAREWELL—IT’LL BE A MUTINY. They weren’t meant to share a stage, let alone a cause. But after CBS axed Colbert—days after he mocked a mega‑deal—late‑night’s rivals are turning into co‑conspirators. No sanitized monologues, no polite handoffs—just a cross‑network show of force that could redraw the rules of TV after dark. So who’s pulling the strings, what’s the plan, and how far are they willing to go? Everything we know is in the comments 👇
Colbert’s Exit Sparks Late-Night Revolt: Fallon, Kimmel, Meyers, and Oliver Plan Historic Stand Stephen Colbert’s abrupt removal from The Late…
End of content
No more pages to load
