More Trouble for MSNBC Star Jen Psaki and Her Poorly Timed Show Launch, as She’s Accused of ‘Lying’ About Biden’s Decline
Jen Psaki’s highly anticipated debut on MSNBC with her new show The Briefing has been marred by controversy from the outset. Just weeks after the show’s premiere, Psaki, the former White House Press Secretary, has found herself embroiled in a public backlash after being accused of lying about President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline. The criticism has come in light of the release of a book, Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again, co-authored by prominent journalists Jake Tapper of CNN and Alex Thompson of Axios.
Allegations About Biden’s Health and Psaki’s Inconsistent Statements
The book claims that aides to President Biden began expressing concerns about his cognitive abilities as far back as 2022, when Psaki was still serving as his Press Secretary. This revelation has opened the door to questions about the true state of Biden’s mental health during the period that Psaki was publicly defending the president’s fitness for office.
Despite these new claims, Psaki has remained steadfast in her position, denying any knowledge of cognitive decline during her time in the White House. She has stated publicly that she never observed any signs of mental deterioration in Biden during their time together. However, critics argue that this stance undermines her credibility, especially in the wake of the book’s revelations. Many viewers and political commentators are calling her out, questioning whether she was being honest or complicit in downplaying concerns that were allegedly present in the White House at the time.
Criticism from Former Officials
The controversy surrounding Psaki has been further fueled by public figures such as Sean Spicer, who served as White House Press Secretary under former President Donald Trump. Spicer has been vocal in his criticism of the media’s handling of Psaki’s past statements, accusing the press of failing to hold her accountable for her assertions regarding Biden’s fitness for office.
“Why is there such a disparity in how the media scrutinizes Psaki versus me?” Spicer asked in a recent interview. “When I was in the role, I faced constant media criticism for every word I spoke, but when it comes to Psaki, it’s as if she’s untouchable.” Spicer’s remarks underscore a growing sentiment among critics that there are double standards at play in the media, especially regarding the scrutiny applied to individuals in different political positions.
As Psaki attempts to establish herself as a commentator and public personality, this situation poses a serious challenge to her credibility. With trust in her statements now being questioned by both the public and political figures, her ability to navigate this controversy and regain confidence from her audience remains uncertain.
Disappointing Ratings for “The Briefing”
Amidst the mounting controversy, The Briefing has been struggling to find its footing in terms of viewership. Despite a strong start with 1.2 million viewers tuning in on its first night, the show has seen a consistent decline in ratings. Subsequent episodes have experienced a noticeable drop in viewership, which has raised concerns at MSNBC about the show’s future.
In stark contrast to Psaki’s rocky start, Rachel Maddow, who previously held the 9 PM EDT time slot, enjoyed a much larger and more loyal following before transitioning her show to a weekly format. The comparison between Maddow’s success and Psaki’s early struggles is critical for network executives, as MSNBC grapples with maintaining its audience engagement and financial sustainability. The decline in ratings is particularly alarming given the high expectations that surrounded Psaki’s transition from the White House to television.
Industry Implications and Future Prospects
The lackluster performance of The Briefing raises significant questions about both Psaki’s ability to hold viewers’ attention and the broader direction of MSNBC’s strategy. With the network already dealing with challenges in terms of audience engagement, The Briefing‘s underperformance could have implications for the network’s broader viewership numbers. As MSNBC continues to navigate shifting leadership dynamics and internal changes, the success—or failure—of Psaki’s show will likely play a pivotal role in shaping the network’s future.
Given the ongoing controversy, many are asking if Jen Psaki can overcome these hurdles and emerge as a prominent voice in political commentary. The mounting criticism, coupled with the decline in ratings, leaves her at a crossroads. Can she turn the tide and build a successful media career, or will the unfolding controversies overshadow her future prospects?
The Cautionary Tale for Media Personalities
The situation surrounding Jen Psaki’s show serves as a cautionary tale for media personalities transitioning from government roles to public commentary. While it’s not uncommon for political figures to pursue careers in broadcasting after their time in public office, it is clear that the transition is not always smooth. The responsibility to maintain credibility, especially when the public is already skeptical, is immense. Psaki’s experience highlights the challenges that come with such a transition, where every statement and action is under intense scrutiny, especially when past comments or allegiances are at odds with public opinion.
For any media personality hoping to build a successful career after leaving government service, the ability to maintain trust and foster engagement with audiences is paramount. In an era where public skepticism is rampant, particularly surrounding politicians-turned-commentators, navigating these challenges will be crucial for anyone trying to establish a lasting presence in the media.
A Complex Relationship with the Biden Administration
Another layer of complexity surrounding Psaki’s situation is her connection to the Biden administration. Having served as the White House Press Secretary, she was one of the most visible voices defending the president’s policies and actions. As new information about Biden’s mental state surfaces, many people are asking how much Psaki knew about the internal discussions around his cognitive abilities and what role she played in shaping the public narrative.
For those who have been following Psaki’s career closely, it’s clear that her loyalty to the administration has always been one of her defining characteristics. But as the story of Biden’s decline becomes more public, questions about her role in defending him despite the mounting concerns may cloud her professional legacy. If she continues to distance herself from these revelations, it could make it even harder for her to maintain credibility with an audience that demands transparency.
Public Skepticism and the Road Ahead
Jen Psaki’s future as a prominent commentator in the media world hinges on how she manages the current crisis surrounding her credibility and her show’s underperformance. As the public’s trust in her begins to waver, she must find a way to rebuild her reputation and offer a more compelling narrative to hold the audience’s attention. Whether she can overcome this controversy remains to be seen, but it’s clear that her success will depend on her ability to pivot and connect with viewers in a meaningful way.
As the media landscape continues to evolve, it is evident that figures like Jen Psaki—who have come from positions of significant political power—will continue to shape the conversation. However, their ability to transition into media personalities with staying power will depend on their capacity to build trust and deliver content that resonates with a diverse and discerning audience.
The unfolding situation with The Briefing and Psaki’s controversial statements is just one example of the challenges faced by political figures in media. Moving forward, the industry will have to strike a balance between political allegiance and maintaining credibility, while ensuring that diverse voices are heard and respected.
Conclusion: Can Jen Psaki Navigate the Storm?
Jen Psaki’s debut on MSNBC and the controversies surrounding her statements about President Biden’s cognitive abilities have put her career in the spotlight. With declining ratings for The Briefing and accusations about her credibility, she faces an uphill battle to regain her footing in the competitive world of political commentary. Whether or not she can overcome these challenges and build a successful media career remains to be seen. As she continues to navigate the fallout from her past statements and present controversies, it’s clear that her next steps will define her future in the industry.
News
My MIL Poured Tea on Me and Served Divorce Papers at Sunday Dinner. “Jake Needs Someone Better”
Part One The iced tea slid over the lip of the cut-crystal pitcher in a thick amber sheet and fell…
“LEAKS OR SMEAR? ‘JAZZY’ CROCKETT FACES ANONYMOUS ACCUSATIONS—BUT WHERE ARE THE RECEIPTS?” Producers say unnamed assistants painted a harsh picture: off‑camera lounging, on‑demand rides, and a red‑carpet attitude. It’s spicy, sure—but none of it is on the record, and no messages, emails, or logs have surfaced to back it up. Is this a genuine HR nightmare or just political theater engineered for clicks? We pulled the claims, chased the paper trail, and noted who declined to comment. Judge the story—not just the sound bites.
A Storm on Capitol Hill In the high-stakes arena of U.S. politics, where every move is scrutinized and every word…
SILENCE AT THE ED SULLIVAN THEATER—AND A THOUSAND THEORIES BY DAWN. For the first time in ages, The Late Show goes dark with no on‑air drumroll, and the questions write themselves. Is CBS quietly fast‑tracking an exit, testing a replacement, or staging a headline‑grabbing reset that only works if nobody sees it coming? The audience can smell when something’s off, and this week feels like a chess move, not a calendar break. If Colbert is staying, why the hush? If he’s not, why the cliffhanger? One empty week has become the loudest story in late‑night, and what happens next could redraw the map for every show that follows. Buckle up—the quiet week might be the plot twist.
Stephen Colbert Heads Into Summer Break Stephen Colbert has officially begun his annual summer hiatus from The Late Show with…
“BOOS. WHISPERS. THEN: ‘SHUT UP.’ KELLY RIPA’S ON‑AIR SNAP—AND MARK CONSUELOS’ QUICK SAVE.” What started as a simple back‑and‑forth turned suddenly combative when a viewer pushed back and Kelly snapped. The crowd answered with a chorus of whispers and boos, and the tension practically hummed—until Mark stepped in, defused the moment, and gave everyone a way out. Is this the cost of speaking your mind in real time, or a host losing patience on a hot morning? The debate’s raging; the video tells its own story.
A Morning Show Takes an Unexpected Turn On Wednesday, August 13, 2025, millions of viewers tuned into ABC’s Live with…
“NO WORDS, JUST A WALK — INSIDE THE 30 SECONDS THAT REWROTE KELLY CLARKSON’S LIVE SEGMENT AND LEFT NBC REELING” A smile, a playful bit, and then the air changed. Kelly Clarkson’s expression went still; Jenna Bush Hager kept talking, unaware the moment had shifted until Kelly stood, slipped past Camera 2, and exited without a word. In the control room: headset chatter, a hard cut, and a scramble to fill the gap. Online, the forensic rewinds began instantly: Which question crossed the line? What was said off‑camera just before the turn? And what does a silent exit communicate that a speech never could? This wasn’t drama for drama’s sake—it felt like a boundary drawn in permanent ink. Watch the viral clip, the angles you didn’t see, and the context that explains the quiet storm 👇
Silence Louder Than Words: Kelly Clarkson’s Calm Walk-Off Stuns Live TV and Puts NBC on Notice It happened without shouting….
MONDAY NIGHT WON’T BE A FAREWELL—IT’LL BE A MUTINY. They weren’t meant to share a stage, let alone a cause. But after CBS axed Colbert—days after he mocked a mega‑deal—late‑night’s rivals are turning into co‑conspirators. No sanitized monologues, no polite handoffs—just a cross‑network show of force that could redraw the rules of TV after dark. So who’s pulling the strings, what’s the plan, and how far are they willing to go? Everything we know is in the comments 👇
Colbert’s Exit Sparks Late-Night Revolt: Fallon, Kimmel, Meyers, and Oliver Plan Historic Stand Stephen Colbert’s abrupt removal from The Late…
End of content
No more pages to load