“Greg Gutfeld Unleashes Firestorm on Joe Scarborough: A Media Feud That’s Heating Up Fast!”

In the high-stakes world of cable news, where every word and action is scrutinized, few feuds have escalated with as much intensity as the ongoing clash between Fox News‘s Greg Gutfeld and MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough. Gutfeld, known for his razor-sharp wit and unapologetic style, has taken aim at Scarborough with a series of blistering attacks that have ignited the media world. What began as a routine conversation about politics quickly spiraled into a heated war of words, with Gutfeld accusing Scarborough of hypocrisy, flip-flopping on his political stances, and more.

As the feud intensifies, it’s clear that this isn’t just a personal vendetta—it’s a microcosm of the wider ideological battles taking place in the media landscape. With Gutfeld’s fiery responses and Scarborough’s more measured tone, this clash is drawing significant attention, raising critical questions about the role of journalists in today’s polarized media environment.

The Spark That Ignited the Blaze

The most recent flare-up came in April 2025, during a segment on Gutfeld! where the Fox News host launched a scathing attack on Scarborough over his shifting views on President Joe Biden’s mental acuity. Scarborough, a former Republican congressman turned MSNBC host, had recently criticized Biden’s performance during the June 2024 presidential debate, calling it “shockingly bad.” This was a sharp reversal from his previous praise of Biden, where he had referred to the president as “the best Biden ever” in terms of intellectual capability.

For Gutfeld, this flip-flop was too much to ignore. He wasted no time in taking aim at Scarborough, calling him out for his inconsistency. “Joe Scarborough’s out there acting like he just discovered Biden’s not firing on all cylinders,” Gutfeld quipped with his trademark smirk. “This guy’s been propping up Biden like he’s the second coming of Einstein, and now he’s shocked? Come on, Joe—your flip-flop game is weaker than a soggy pancake.”

This biting commentary had the studio audience in stitches, but Gutfeld wasn’t done. He went on to accuse Scarborough of covering for Biden over the years, claiming the MSNBC host had ignored signs of the president’s cognitive decline in order to maintain a partisan agenda. Gutfeld’s attack was both theatrical and sharp, designed to hit Scarborough where it hurt the most: his credibility.

A Feud Rooted in Contrasts

The tension between Gutfeld and Scarborough is amplified by the stark contrast between their styles and approaches to political commentary. Gutfeld, known as the court jester of conservative media, thrives on irreverence and humor. His show, Gutfeld!, often outperforms late-night comedy giants like Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert, thanks to his unique blend of comedy, sarcasm, and conservative viewpoints. Gutfeld’s humor is often self-deprecating and absurd, but it is also deeply pointed, aimed at poking holes in what he sees as the absurdities of liberal politics.

In contrast, Scarborough, with his deep voice and earnest demeanor, has positioned himself as a voice of reason, albeit one that has shifted away from his conservative roots. His transformation from a firebrand Republican to a vocal critic of the GOP has earned him a following among liberals and independents, but it has also attracted the ire of conservatives like Gutfeld. For Gutfeld, Scarborough represents everything that’s wrong with the political establishment: someone who switches political allegiances when the winds shift, all in the name of relevance.

In 2017, when Scarborough announced that he was leaving the Republican Party, Gutfeld pounced. On The Five, he mocked Scarborough’s decision as a desperate attempt to stay in the media spotlight, calling him a “draining the swamp” opportunist. Gutfeld’s disdain for Scarborough’s shift in political allegiance remains a central theme in their feud, with the Fox News host continuing to paint Scarborough as someone who simply jumps on whichever side of the ideological fence benefits him the most.

A Feud That Strikes at the Heart of Media Divides

This war of words between Gutfeld and Scarborough speaks to a larger debate about media influence and bias in today’s political landscape. Gutfeld’s critiques of Scarborough aren’t just about the man himself—they represent a broader critique of the media establishment, particularly the way in which outlets like MSNBC have been accused of promoting a partisan agenda under the guise of objectivity. To Gutfeld, Scarborough’s flip-flops and perceived hypocrisies only serve to reinforce the idea that mainstream media personalities are more interested in political power than in truthful reporting.

Scarborough, for his part, has largely ignored Gutfeld’s jabs, maintaining his own brand of measured, often introspective commentary. His refusal to engage directly with Gutfeld has only fueled the latter’s provocations, with Gutfeld claiming, “Joe’s too busy preaching to his choir to respond. But we see you, Joe. We see you.” By keeping silent, Scarborough is inadvertently feeding into the one-sided nature of the feud, giving Gutfeld more material to work with while maintaining his own air of gravitas and control.

For many viewers, Gutfeld’s attacks on Scarborough are a welcome antidote to what they see as the sanctimonious tone of mainstream media. To Gutfeld’s conservative audience, Scarborough’s evolution from GOP loyalist to MSNBC pundit represents the kind of opportunism that they feel is rampant in the media. For Gutfeld, taking down Scarborough is more than just personal—it’s a critique of the broader media elite that he believes is out of touch with ordinary Americans.

The Art of the Gutfeld Takedown

What sets Gutfeld apart from other conservative commentators is his delivery. Unlike the traditional, often outraged pundits of right-wing media, Gutfeld mixes humor with sharp political insights, creating a brand of commentary that is both entertaining and scathing. His ability to blend pop culture references with pointed jabs at political opponents makes his critiques feel more like stand-up comedy than political analysis.

For instance, in one memorable segment, Gutfeld compared Scarborough’s flip-flop on Biden to “a weatherman predicting sunshine during a hurricane.” The line landed because it was vivid, accessible, and relatable, while also being ruthless in its critique of Scarborough’s inconsistency. It’s this mix of humor, wit, and pointed political commentary that has made Gutfeld such a compelling figure in conservative media.

Gutfeld’s theatricality gives him a unique edge in the media wars. By delivering his critiques with humor, he disarms his audience, making them more likely to embrace his ideological message while enjoying the performance. Scarborough, on the other hand, with his earnest and serious demeanor, represents a more traditional, establishment voice. Gutfeld’s playful irreverence provides a stark contrast to Scarborough’s gravitas, and that’s what makes their feud so compelling.

What’s Next for This Feud?

The future of this feud remains uncertain. Scarborough continues to maintain his silence, content to keep his focus on his own platform. However, Gutfeld’s taunts are unlikely to stop anytime soon. As long as Scarborough remains a prominent voice on MSNBC, Gutfeld will likely keep him in his sights, using every opportunity to critique his flip-flopping and the broader media landscape that Scarborough represents.

A direct confrontation between the two is unlikely, as both have established their own distinct niches in the media world. Scarborough thrives in the serious, often politically charged atmosphere of Morning Joe, while Gutfeld dominates late-night TV with his irreverent humor and populist rhetoric. A public debate or joint appearance would no doubt be a ratings bonanza, but for now, the two seem content to engage from a distance.

The Bigger Picture: The Media Landscape at War

Ultimately, the Gutfeld-Scarborough feud is about more than just personal rivalry. It represents the ideological divide that has come to define much of the media in America today. Gutfeld’s attacks on Scarborough aren’t just about one man—they are about the way the media is perceived by audiences on opposite sides of the political spectrum.

Gutfeld’s populist, irreverent style speaks to a conservative base that feels ignored or misrepresented by traditional news outlets. Scarborough, in contrast, has become a symbol of the establishment media that many conservatives view with skepticism and disdain. This clash between the two reflects the broader struggle for dominance in the media world—a battle where trust, credibility, and ideological alignment are everything.

In the end, this feud is about more than just Fox News vs. MSNBC—it’s about the future of media in a polarized society. Gutfeld’s rise and Scarborough’s persistence speak to the growing divide between the media elite and the people they serve. And as long as that divide exists, the war of words between these two media figures will likely continue to heat up.