FOX NEWS SHOCKER: Emily Compagno’s Controversial Comments About Pregnant Women in Kenya Spark Outrage—Kenyans Demand Apology!

Fox News host Emily Compagno has found herself at the center of a fierce controversy after her recent appearance on Gutfeld! where she made an explosive claim about the rights of pregnant women in Kenya. During her segment, Compagno suggested that pregnant women in Kenya not only lacked voting rights but were also prohibited from leaving their homes. The statement quickly ignited outrage both in Kenya and across social media, with many calling her remarks misleading and factually incorrect.

Compagno, known for her bold political commentary, was discussing American women’s rights when she shifted focus to the situation of women in other countries, saying: “What about in Kenya where pregnant women can’t leave the house so they absolutely have no constructive right to vote?” This comment was quickly picked up by critics, with Kenyan politicians and social media users calling for a retraction.

Immediate Backlash from Kenyan Leaders

Kenyan political strategist Pauline Njoroge immediately took to Twitter, expressing her outrage: “What is this? What is Emily Compagno saying? That in Kenya pregnant women can’t leave the house so they have no right to vote? What does she imagine our country is like? That statement is incorrect, misleading, condescending, and should be withdrawn.”

Esther M. Passaris, a member of Kenya’s National Assembly, also chimed in, correcting Compagno’s claims: “Pregnant women in Kenya are allowed to leave the house. Pregnant women in Kenya can vote. Pregnant women get priority on voting lines. Pregnant women give birth free of charge under the government #lindamama program. Retract your statement.”

In fact, Kenya’s Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) has made significant efforts to ensure that pregnant women, the elderly, and disabled individuals have easier access to voting by allowing them to bypass long queues. This reality sharply contrasts with Compagno’s statements, which many believe paint a harmful and inaccurate picture of women’s rights in Kenya.

Compagno Stands by Her Remarks, Citing Unverified Sources

Despite the mounting backlash, Emily Compagno has refused to retract her statement, with a Fox News spokesperson defending her comments. Compagno reportedly referenced two unsourced websites—Grazia Daily and World Population Review—to support her claims about cultural norms in western Kenya and the supposed restrictions on pregnant women’s ability to leave their homes.

However, neither of these sources provided official citations or credible evidence to substantiate Compagno’s assertion. The lack of verified information only deepened the frustration among Kenyan social media users, who felt that Compagno’s comments misrepresented their country and perpetuated negative stereotypes about women in Africa.

The Broader Conversation: Media Responsibility and Accuracy

This controversy highlights a crucial issue—how should the media handle sensitive topics, especially when discussing different countries and cultures? As the internet and social media make information travel faster than ever, it’s essential for public figures like Compagno to be responsible in their commentary, particularly when discussing issues that impact millions of people worldwide.

In the case of Kenya, many argue that misrepresentations about the rights and lives of women only perpetuate harmful stereotypes. The outcry from Kenyan citizens, including influential political figures, has made it clear that accuracy and respect for cultural contexts are paramount when making such significant claims.

Will Fox News Address the Fallout?

The incident has prompted widespread calls for an apology, with many Kenyans feeling that their country has been unfairly tarnished by Compagno’s remarks. As the backlash continues to grow, the question remains: will Fox News and Compagno issue a formal apology, or will they stand by the unverified sources that sparked this controversy?

For now, the debate rages on, and Compagno’s comments continue to draw attention—both for their inaccuracy and for the lessons they offer about the responsibility of public figures to verify their statements, especially when discussing other countries and cultures.

In a media landscape where every word can become a headline, this incident serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of thoughtful, fact-based reporting in an era of increasing global interconnectivity.