Tensions Explode on The Five as Jessica Tarlov Clashes with Jeanine Pirro Over Trump’s Immigration Policies

A fiery exchange on The Five had viewers on the edge of their seats when co-host Jessica Tarlov clashed with former judge Jeanine Pirro over the Trump administration’s controversial deportation of immigrants to El Salvador. What began as a heated debate over immigration quickly escalated into a rare on-air confrontation, leaving fans questioning whether this was just another lively discussion or a deeper sign of tensions brewing within the Fox News panel.

The Debate Over Immigration and Due Process

The disagreement ignited when Pirro defended the deportation of hundreds of immigrants, many allegedly connected to Venezuelan gangs, to El Salvador. Tarlov, however, challenged her stance, suggesting that the Trump administration’s actions signaled an end to the asylum system as it was previously understood. “I’m just saying if you don’t believe in due process anymore, then be honest about it, because that’s what’s going on here,” Tarlov asserted.

Pirro, not backing down, quickly countered: “The only due process I believe in is the legal way to enter this country.” Tarlov, visibly frustrated, shot back, “But claiming asylum is legal.” The back-and-forth escalated as Pirro insisted that only those who follow the legal process should be allowed to enter, dismissing the idea that asylum claims could be legitimate without court approval. “Yeah, well, only if you do the legal process, you don’t come illegally,” Pirro stated firmly.

The Controversial Term “Disappeared”

Tarlov, focusing on the case of a Venezuelan immigrant who had a legitimate asylum claim but was allegedly detained and removed before his court hearing, pressed the issue further. “They tried, and then they’re being disappeared from their court hearing,” Tarlov explained, using the term “disappeared” to highlight the troubling circumstances surrounding the deportations.

Pirro mocked Tarlov’s language, countering, “Being disappeared, Americans are being disappeared.” This remark only added fuel to the fire, prompting Tarlov to clarify her position, pointing out that the individual had a legitimate asylum claim, complete with tattoos as a possible form of identification. “Legitimate asylum claim, it’s not legitimate until a judge says it’s legitimate,” Pirro replied dismissively, her arms crossed and her gaze fixed on the camera.

Legal Order Halting Deportations

The debate grew even more heated as Tarlov cited a recent U.S. District Judge’s ruling that ordered the immediate halt of deportation flights, even as they were already airborne. Judge James E. Boasberg had issued a verbal order that was later confirmed in writing, demanding that the flights turn back. The situation prompted further scrutiny, as White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded by claiming that the administration had no obligation to comply with the judge’s order, citing it as having “no lawful basis.”

The drama surrounding the deportations escalated as reports came in from the Venezuelan National Assembly, stating that those deported had not committed crimes in either the U.S. or El Salvador, raising questions about the legality and fairness of the deportation process.

Unresolved Tensions and Growing Speculation

As the debate continued to unfold, it was clear that this disagreement was more than just a difference of opinion—it was a moment that showcased the growing ideological divide among The Five hosts. Fans of the show quickly took to social media, buzzing with reactions to the heated exchange. While some praised Tarlov for standing up for due process and immigrant rights, others sided with Pirro, arguing that maintaining strict immigration laws was essential to protecting the country.

The fallout from this intense moment has only added fuel to the ongoing national debate about immigration, due process, and the handling of asylum seekers. With The Five already known for its fiery debates, this clash between Tarlov and Pirro has raised questions about the future dynamics of the show and whether such disagreements will continue to escalate.

As the discussion continues to unfold, one thing is clear: this heated exchange is far from over, and the larger issue of immigration reform remains a volatile topic in American politics.