Charles Barkley Boldly Declares Michael Jordan Has Ended More Careers ‘Than the Plague’
NBA legend Charles Barkley made waves with a powerful statement about Michael Jordan’s lasting impact, asserting that Jordan has ended more basketball careers than the plague. Barkley’s blunt commentary highlights the immense pressure that accompanies comparisons to arguably the greatest basketball player ever.
Michael Jordan, now 62, is widely celebrated as the greatest player in NBA history, known particularly for his extraordinary 12-year tenure with the Chicago Bulls during the 1980s and 1990s. Jordan’s legacy includes six NBA championships and a reputation for unmatched competitiveness. This reputation, Barkley insists, has inadvertently destroyed the careers of countless promising talents who couldn’t handle the immense pressure of being labeled “the next Michael Jordan.”
Barkley, also 62, expressed these bold views during a recent appearance on The Dan Patrick Show. The discussion arose when Barkley was asked about rising NCAA star Cooper Flagg, an 18-year-old standout from Duke, who has recently drawn significant attention. Flagg’s impressive performances have sparked speculation about his potential to reach heights similar to NBA legends, prompting comparisons to Jordan and other greats.
However, Barkley strongly opposed these comparisons, emphasizing the harm they could inflict. He acknowledged Flagg’s talent and potential but criticized the tendency to prematurely label young athletes as successors to icons like Jordan. According to Barkley, such comparisons are not just unfair but also harmful, often leading young athletes to crumble under pressure and fade into obscurity.
“I see Cooper Flagg. I see he’s a terrific young player, he looks amazing on television, can’t wait to see him in the NBA,” Barkley said, cautiously praising the young star. He then emphasized, “I hate when guys on television try to compare. First of all, to say he’s already somebody in the NBA is unfair to that person in the NBA.”
Barkley expanded his critique by directly invoking Jordan’s powerful legacy: “I think Michael Jordan has killed more people than the plague. You know, ‘This guy is the next Michael Jordan.’ You don’t turn out to be Michael Jordan.”
Since Jordan’s retirement, the NBA has witnessed numerous young players prematurely burdened with comparisons to his greatness—most notably LeBron James, who despite immense success, has faced constant scrutiny about his legacy versus Jordan’s. Barkley argues that such comparisons set athletes up for failure, overshadowing their personal achievements and unique playing styles.
Flagg, widely anticipated to become a top NBA draft pick, faces this exact predicament. The young Duke star is already grappling with the pressure of living up to comparisons with the sport’s greatest. Barkley’s warning serves as a timely reminder of the risks associated with early expectations and the pressure these comparisons create.
In the end, Barkley’s statement is not merely about basketball greatness. It underscores a broader issue within sports culture: the destructive nature of unrealistic expectations. By invoking Jordan’s legendary impact, Barkley cautions fans and media alike to appreciate new talent without burdening them with the ghosts of legends past.
News
My MIL Poured Tea on Me and Served Divorce Papers at Sunday Dinner. “Jake Needs Someone Better”
Part One The iced tea slid over the lip of the cut-crystal pitcher in a thick amber sheet and fell…
“LEAKS OR SMEAR? ‘JAZZY’ CROCKETT FACES ANONYMOUS ACCUSATIONS—BUT WHERE ARE THE RECEIPTS?” Producers say unnamed assistants painted a harsh picture: off‑camera lounging, on‑demand rides, and a red‑carpet attitude. It’s spicy, sure—but none of it is on the record, and no messages, emails, or logs have surfaced to back it up. Is this a genuine HR nightmare or just political theater engineered for clicks? We pulled the claims, chased the paper trail, and noted who declined to comment. Judge the story—not just the sound bites.
A Storm on Capitol Hill In the high-stakes arena of U.S. politics, where every move is scrutinized and every word…
SILENCE AT THE ED SULLIVAN THEATER—AND A THOUSAND THEORIES BY DAWN. For the first time in ages, The Late Show goes dark with no on‑air drumroll, and the questions write themselves. Is CBS quietly fast‑tracking an exit, testing a replacement, or staging a headline‑grabbing reset that only works if nobody sees it coming? The audience can smell when something’s off, and this week feels like a chess move, not a calendar break. If Colbert is staying, why the hush? If he’s not, why the cliffhanger? One empty week has become the loudest story in late‑night, and what happens next could redraw the map for every show that follows. Buckle up—the quiet week might be the plot twist.
Stephen Colbert Heads Into Summer Break Stephen Colbert has officially begun his annual summer hiatus from The Late Show with…
“BOOS. WHISPERS. THEN: ‘SHUT UP.’ KELLY RIPA’S ON‑AIR SNAP—AND MARK CONSUELOS’ QUICK SAVE.” What started as a simple back‑and‑forth turned suddenly combative when a viewer pushed back and Kelly snapped. The crowd answered with a chorus of whispers and boos, and the tension practically hummed—until Mark stepped in, defused the moment, and gave everyone a way out. Is this the cost of speaking your mind in real time, or a host losing patience on a hot morning? The debate’s raging; the video tells its own story.
A Morning Show Takes an Unexpected Turn On Wednesday, August 13, 2025, millions of viewers tuned into ABC’s Live with…
“NO WORDS, JUST A WALK — INSIDE THE 30 SECONDS THAT REWROTE KELLY CLARKSON’S LIVE SEGMENT AND LEFT NBC REELING” A smile, a playful bit, and then the air changed. Kelly Clarkson’s expression went still; Jenna Bush Hager kept talking, unaware the moment had shifted until Kelly stood, slipped past Camera 2, and exited without a word. In the control room: headset chatter, a hard cut, and a scramble to fill the gap. Online, the forensic rewinds began instantly: Which question crossed the line? What was said off‑camera just before the turn? And what does a silent exit communicate that a speech never could? This wasn’t drama for drama’s sake—it felt like a boundary drawn in permanent ink. Watch the viral clip, the angles you didn’t see, and the context that explains the quiet storm 👇
Silence Louder Than Words: Kelly Clarkson’s Calm Walk-Off Stuns Live TV and Puts NBC on Notice It happened without shouting….
MONDAY NIGHT WON’T BE A FAREWELL—IT’LL BE A MUTINY. They weren’t meant to share a stage, let alone a cause. But after CBS axed Colbert—days after he mocked a mega‑deal—late‑night’s rivals are turning into co‑conspirators. No sanitized monologues, no polite handoffs—just a cross‑network show of force that could redraw the rules of TV after dark. So who’s pulling the strings, what’s the plan, and how far are they willing to go? Everything we know is in the comments 👇
Colbert’s Exit Sparks Late-Night Revolt: Fallon, Kimmel, Meyers, and Oliver Plan Historic Stand Stephen Colbert’s abrupt removal from The Late…
End of content
No more pages to load