Stephen A. Smith’s Ongoing Criticism of Patrick Mahomes: A Debate About Greatness, Financial Strategy, and Legacy
The Continued Scrutiny of Patrick Mahomes’ Career and Financial Decisions
The debate surrounding Patrick Mahomes has become a staple in sports media, especially with Stephen A. Smith leading the charge on ESPN’s First Take. While Mahomes has established himself as one of the most successful quarterbacks in NFL history, his career has been under intense scrutiny, particularly from Smith, who has consistently raised the bar of expectations for Mahomes’ legacy and financial decisions. This ongoing dialogue has not only focused on his on-field performance but also his financial choices, particularly in the context of his record-setting $450 million contract with the Kansas City Chiefs.
The Genesis of Stephen A. Smith’s Criticism
Stephen A. Smith’s relationship with Patrick Mahomes has evolved from one of acknowledgment to consistent critique. His criticism first began in earnest during the 2021 Super Bowl, where Mahomes and the Chiefs were defeated by Tom Brady’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Despite Mahomes’ record-setting performances in the regular season, Smith famously tweeted after the loss, “No more talks about Mahomes being the GOAT.” He pointed to Mahomes’ failure to deliver in the biggest game of the season as proof that the young quarterback’s path to legendary status had hit a major roadblock.
Smith’s harsh critiques didn’t stop there. Following the Chiefs’ emotional loss to the Buffalo Bills in 2023, where Mahomes was visibly frustrated over an officiating call, Smith declared it “the first time in his career I’ve seen him embarrass himself.” This moment encapsulated the kind of commentary Smith has become known for—holding Mahomes to an almost unattainable standard.
Super Bowl Criticism: The “GOAT” Debate Intensifies
In the build-up to Super Bowl 2025, Smith’s scrutiny on Mahomes escalated further. After a disappointing blowout loss to the Philadelphia Eagles, Smith was quick to declare that “the GOAT status is gone for the foreseeable future.” He compared Mahomes’ Super Bowl performances to those of all-time legends like Tom Brady and Joe Montana, emphasizing that Mahomes’ Super Bowl record, which included throwing five interceptions and posting an 85.2 passer rating, was not on par with those of his predecessors.
This pattern of critiquing Mahomes’ Super Bowl losses has fueled further debate about his place in the GOAT conversation. Some fans feel Smith’s expectations are unfairly harsh, while others agree that Mahomes’ quest for greatness is still a work in progress, especially when the stakes are at their highest.
The Financial Debate: Is Mahomes Lucky or Savvy?
In a twist that has further divided opinions, Stephen A. Smith turned his attention to Mahomes’ financial decisions. Despite Mahomes’ staggering $450 million contract, which includes $141 million guaranteed, Smith suggested that Mahomes could be “one bad investment away from losing it all.” This critique questioned the quarterback’s financial choices, given the long-term structure of his contract that some critics have labeled “team-friendly” in nature.
Many analysts, however, pointed to Mahomes’ calculated investments outside of football, including his endorsements with Adidas, Oakley, State Farm, and other major companies, as evidence of his business acumen. Mahomes has invested in sports teams, tech companies, and real estate, diversifying his income and building a lasting financial legacy. “Mahomes’ portfolio is far from risky,” one analyst said, “his team has made smart, measured decisions that ensure his long-term financial stability.”
However, Smith has voiced concerns that Mahomes’ contract sacrifices potential earnings in favor of roster flexibility for the Chiefs. While some fans argue that Mahomes’ decision shows loyalty to his team, others contend that it may have led to underpayment compared to the astronomical contracts given to newer quarterbacks in the NFL.
The Cultural Divide: Mahomes vs. The Old Guard
What sets the debate over Mahomes apart from other athletes is the generational divide it reflects. Smith’s critiques of Mahomes often seem to carry the weight of traditional values in sports—values that emphasize winning at all costs, and performance above all else. The pushback, however, often comes from younger fans and analysts who view Mahomes as a modern-day icon who transcends sports and embodies leadership and personal branding as much as athletic excellence.
“Mahomes represents the future of the NFL,” said one fan. “He’s not just about stats and titles—he’s about business, brand, and legacy.”
In contrast, some older sports figures, like Smith, see Mahomes’ brand-building as distracting from the fundamentals of what made legends like Brady and Montana great. They emphasize that Mahomes, with all his talent, still has to prove himself in the postseason before he can be fully inducted into the pantheon of all-time greats.
The Growing Public Divide: Can Mahomes Overcome the Criticism?
The public reaction to Smith’s comments has been mixed, with Mahomes’ supporters rallying behind him, asserting that he is being unfairly scrutinized. They argue that Smith’s harshness overlooks the incredible achievements Mahomes has already accomplished and that his contract restructuring shows his commitment to winning championships with the Chiefs.
On the other hand, critics of Mahomes, fueled by Smith’s ongoing remarks, argue that the quarterback’s slip-ups in big games should be taken more seriously. “He’s a great regular season quarterback, but can he deliver in the Super Bowl?” said one fan.
As the debate rages on, one thing remains clear: Mahomes has become the face of modern football, with every move—on and off the field—scrutinized by millions. Whether he will live up to the lofty expectations set for him or whether his journey will be defined by these critiques remains to be seen. For now, Stephen A. Smith’s ongoing commentary will continue to fuel the conversation, shaping how Mahomes is perceived by the public and shaping his legacy in real time.
News
My MIL Poured Tea on Me and Served Divorce Papers at Sunday Dinner. “Jake Needs Someone Better”
Part One The iced tea slid over the lip of the cut-crystal pitcher in a thick amber sheet and fell…
“LEAKS OR SMEAR? ‘JAZZY’ CROCKETT FACES ANONYMOUS ACCUSATIONS—BUT WHERE ARE THE RECEIPTS?” Producers say unnamed assistants painted a harsh picture: off‑camera lounging, on‑demand rides, and a red‑carpet attitude. It’s spicy, sure—but none of it is on the record, and no messages, emails, or logs have surfaced to back it up. Is this a genuine HR nightmare or just political theater engineered for clicks? We pulled the claims, chased the paper trail, and noted who declined to comment. Judge the story—not just the sound bites.
A Storm on Capitol Hill In the high-stakes arena of U.S. politics, where every move is scrutinized and every word…
SILENCE AT THE ED SULLIVAN THEATER—AND A THOUSAND THEORIES BY DAWN. For the first time in ages, The Late Show goes dark with no on‑air drumroll, and the questions write themselves. Is CBS quietly fast‑tracking an exit, testing a replacement, or staging a headline‑grabbing reset that only works if nobody sees it coming? The audience can smell when something’s off, and this week feels like a chess move, not a calendar break. If Colbert is staying, why the hush? If he’s not, why the cliffhanger? One empty week has become the loudest story in late‑night, and what happens next could redraw the map for every show that follows. Buckle up—the quiet week might be the plot twist.
Stephen Colbert Heads Into Summer Break Stephen Colbert has officially begun his annual summer hiatus from The Late Show with…
“BOOS. WHISPERS. THEN: ‘SHUT UP.’ KELLY RIPA’S ON‑AIR SNAP—AND MARK CONSUELOS’ QUICK SAVE.” What started as a simple back‑and‑forth turned suddenly combative when a viewer pushed back and Kelly snapped. The crowd answered with a chorus of whispers and boos, and the tension practically hummed—until Mark stepped in, defused the moment, and gave everyone a way out. Is this the cost of speaking your mind in real time, or a host losing patience on a hot morning? The debate’s raging; the video tells its own story.
A Morning Show Takes an Unexpected Turn On Wednesday, August 13, 2025, millions of viewers tuned into ABC’s Live with…
“NO WORDS, JUST A WALK — INSIDE THE 30 SECONDS THAT REWROTE KELLY CLARKSON’S LIVE SEGMENT AND LEFT NBC REELING” A smile, a playful bit, and then the air changed. Kelly Clarkson’s expression went still; Jenna Bush Hager kept talking, unaware the moment had shifted until Kelly stood, slipped past Camera 2, and exited without a word. In the control room: headset chatter, a hard cut, and a scramble to fill the gap. Online, the forensic rewinds began instantly: Which question crossed the line? What was said off‑camera just before the turn? And what does a silent exit communicate that a speech never could? This wasn’t drama for drama’s sake—it felt like a boundary drawn in permanent ink. Watch the viral clip, the angles you didn’t see, and the context that explains the quiet storm 👇
Silence Louder Than Words: Kelly Clarkson’s Calm Walk-Off Stuns Live TV and Puts NBC on Notice It happened without shouting….
MONDAY NIGHT WON’T BE A FAREWELL—IT’LL BE A MUTINY. They weren’t meant to share a stage, let alone a cause. But after CBS axed Colbert—days after he mocked a mega‑deal—late‑night’s rivals are turning into co‑conspirators. No sanitized monologues, no polite handoffs—just a cross‑network show of force that could redraw the rules of TV after dark. So who’s pulling the strings, what’s the plan, and how far are they willing to go? Everything we know is in the comments 👇
Colbert’s Exit Sparks Late-Night Revolt: Fallon, Kimmel, Meyers, and Oliver Plan Historic Stand Stephen Colbert’s abrupt removal from The Late…
End of content
No more pages to load