Riley Gaines Calls Out High School Player Henry Hanlon Over Alleged Unfair Advantage in Women’s Sports
Riley Gaines, known for her vocal advocacy for women’s rights in sports, has stirred controversy once again by slamming high school basketball player Henry Hanlon, whom she accused of having an unfair advantage by competing in girls’ sports. Hanlon, a three-sport athlete, was recently the standout player in a high school basketball game, scoring an impressive 24 points for San Francisco Waldorf High School in a 54-22 victory over the Jewish Community High School.
Gaines’ Outrage and Accusations
In a tweet that quickly garnered attention, Gaines expressed her disapproval of Hanlon’s performance, particularly in games where she claimed the player contributed a disproportionate amount of points. “Male player, Henry Hanlon, scored 26 points in girls high school basketball game last week in San Francisco. This is the third consecutive game where he’s scored more than 1/3 of the team’s points,” Gaines wrote on X (formerly Twitter). She followed up with the comment, “The emperor wears no clothes,” a phrase commonly used to highlight something that is being overlooked or ignored.
This tweet came shortly after Hanlon’s strong performance in the San Francisco Waldorf High School girls basketball game, where he dominated with his scoring, further escalating the public debate on gender and sports.
The Bigger Picture: Riley Gaines’ Advocacy for Women’s Sports
Riley Gaines has long been an outspoken advocate for women’s safety and fairness in sports, particularly regarding the participation of transgender athletes. Gaines made national headlines during the 2022 NCAA Championship when she and Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer, tied for fifth place in the women’s 200-yard freestyle event. However, only Thomas was presented with an award, sparking public outcry and debates about fairness in women’s sports. Gaines used that incident as the catalyst for her outspoken stance on the need to protect women’s spaces in athletics.
Her remarks on Hanlon are in line with her advocacy for fair play and the exclusion of athletes she believes have inherent physical advantages due to biological sex. By bringing attention to Hanlon’s performances, Gaines is framing her argument as part of her broader campaign to protect the integrity of women’s sports.
Riley Gaines’ Comments on Transgender Athletes and Exclusion from Women’s Sports
In addition to her comments about Hanlon, Gaines has also been active in expressing her views on transgender athletes competing in women’s sports. She has been a staunch opponent of the inclusion of transgender women in women’s competitions, arguing that it undermines fair competition, particularly in physical sports. Gaines has often shared her frustrations on social media about the issue, including when she praised a girls’ high school basketball team for refusing to compete against a transgender player. The team, mostly made up of Muslim girls, decided not to play in a game against San Francisco Waldorf High School due to the inclusion of a transgender athlete on the opposing team.
Her praise for these girls further cemented her position as a vocal critic of the inclusion of transgender athletes in women’s sports. “Good on these girls. Don’t participate in the farce,” she wrote on X. Gaines also sarcastically remarked about the transgender athlete being the captain of the team, highlighting physical characteristics that she believed revealed the athlete’s biological sex, furthering her criticism.
Mixed Reactions to Gaines’ Comments
Gaines’ comments, both about Hanlon and transgender athletes, have sparked mixed reactions. Supporters of her stance argue that her critiques are necessary for maintaining the integrity of women’s sports, with some citing her past experiences and her advocacy for women’s spaces. They believe that Gaines is speaking up for fairness in competition and women’s rights, particularly for female athletes who may feel overshadowed by athletes with inherent physical advantages due to being born male.
However, critics of Gaines argue that her views are exclusionary and harmful, especially to transgender athletes who are already marginalized in society. These critics view her comments as a rejection of the progress made in gender inclusivity and equality in sports. Some of Gaines’ remarks have been accused of being divisive and not taking into account the complexities of gender identity and the unique challenges faced by transgender individuals.
What’s Next for Riley Gaines and Women’s Sports?
As Gaines continues her advocacy, it’s clear that her views are deeply polarizing. Her outspoken nature and willingness to confront controversial topics have made her a key figure in the debate over the future of women’s sports. The conversation surrounding transgender athletes in women’s sports is far from over, and Gaines’ comments about Hanlon and other incidents continue to fuel that discussion.
With the rise of social media, these debates are more visible than ever before, and both sides of the issue are passionate about protecting their beliefs. Whether or not Gaines’ calls for change will have a lasting impact on the rules and regulations surrounding gender in sports remains to be seen. One thing is certain: the debate on how to balance inclusion with fair competition is ongoing, and athletes like Riley Gaines will continue to be at the forefront of this critical conversation.
News
My MIL Poured Tea on Me and Served Divorce Papers at Sunday Dinner. “Jake Needs Someone Better”
Part One The iced tea slid over the lip of the cut-crystal pitcher in a thick amber sheet and fell…
“LEAKS OR SMEAR? ‘JAZZY’ CROCKETT FACES ANONYMOUS ACCUSATIONS—BUT WHERE ARE THE RECEIPTS?” Producers say unnamed assistants painted a harsh picture: off‑camera lounging, on‑demand rides, and a red‑carpet attitude. It’s spicy, sure—but none of it is on the record, and no messages, emails, or logs have surfaced to back it up. Is this a genuine HR nightmare or just political theater engineered for clicks? We pulled the claims, chased the paper trail, and noted who declined to comment. Judge the story—not just the sound bites.
A Storm on Capitol Hill In the high-stakes arena of U.S. politics, where every move is scrutinized and every word…
SILENCE AT THE ED SULLIVAN THEATER—AND A THOUSAND THEORIES BY DAWN. For the first time in ages, The Late Show goes dark with no on‑air drumroll, and the questions write themselves. Is CBS quietly fast‑tracking an exit, testing a replacement, or staging a headline‑grabbing reset that only works if nobody sees it coming? The audience can smell when something’s off, and this week feels like a chess move, not a calendar break. If Colbert is staying, why the hush? If he’s not, why the cliffhanger? One empty week has become the loudest story in late‑night, and what happens next could redraw the map for every show that follows. Buckle up—the quiet week might be the plot twist.
Stephen Colbert Heads Into Summer Break Stephen Colbert has officially begun his annual summer hiatus from The Late Show with…
“BOOS. WHISPERS. THEN: ‘SHUT UP.’ KELLY RIPA’S ON‑AIR SNAP—AND MARK CONSUELOS’ QUICK SAVE.” What started as a simple back‑and‑forth turned suddenly combative when a viewer pushed back and Kelly snapped. The crowd answered with a chorus of whispers and boos, and the tension practically hummed—until Mark stepped in, defused the moment, and gave everyone a way out. Is this the cost of speaking your mind in real time, or a host losing patience on a hot morning? The debate’s raging; the video tells its own story.
A Morning Show Takes an Unexpected Turn On Wednesday, August 13, 2025, millions of viewers tuned into ABC’s Live with…
“NO WORDS, JUST A WALK — INSIDE THE 30 SECONDS THAT REWROTE KELLY CLARKSON’S LIVE SEGMENT AND LEFT NBC REELING” A smile, a playful bit, and then the air changed. Kelly Clarkson’s expression went still; Jenna Bush Hager kept talking, unaware the moment had shifted until Kelly stood, slipped past Camera 2, and exited without a word. In the control room: headset chatter, a hard cut, and a scramble to fill the gap. Online, the forensic rewinds began instantly: Which question crossed the line? What was said off‑camera just before the turn? And what does a silent exit communicate that a speech never could? This wasn’t drama for drama’s sake—it felt like a boundary drawn in permanent ink. Watch the viral clip, the angles you didn’t see, and the context that explains the quiet storm 👇
Silence Louder Than Words: Kelly Clarkson’s Calm Walk-Off Stuns Live TV and Puts NBC on Notice It happened without shouting….
MONDAY NIGHT WON’T BE A FAREWELL—IT’LL BE A MUTINY. They weren’t meant to share a stage, let alone a cause. But after CBS axed Colbert—days after he mocked a mega‑deal—late‑night’s rivals are turning into co‑conspirators. No sanitized monologues, no polite handoffs—just a cross‑network show of force that could redraw the rules of TV after dark. So who’s pulling the strings, what’s the plan, and how far are they willing to go? Everything we know is in the comments 👇
Colbert’s Exit Sparks Late-Night Revolt: Fallon, Kimmel, Meyers, and Oliver Plan Historic Stand Stephen Colbert’s abrupt removal from The Late…
End of content
No more pages to load