Fox News Host Jessica Tarlov Faces Backlash Over ‘Elitist’ and ‘Racist’ Comment During Heated Immigration Debate
Fox News presenter Jessica Tarlov has come under fire after making a controversial remark on the network’s popular show The Five, which sparked a wave of outrage among viewers. Tarlov, a liberal voice on the panel, shocked both her co-host Jesse Watters and the watching audience with her question about manicures amid ongoing discussions about Donald Trump’s sweeping immigration raids. The comment has since ignited a storm of criticism, with some accusing Tarlov of elitism, racism, and ignorance.

The heated exchange occurred earlier this week, during a live broadcast where the panel was discussing the anti-ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) protests that erupted in Los Angeles in response to President Trump’s controversial immigration policies. These policies have sparked widespread protests, and tensions surrounding the topic of deportations have reached a boiling point.
Tensions Erupt Over Immigration Raids and Riots
The ongoing protests, which began in Los Angeles, were prompted by allegations that ICE agents had detained two truckloads of individuals at a manufacturing site in the city. The situation quickly escalated as demonstrators took to the streets, leading to violent clashes, looting, and arson. Over the weekend, protesters were seen waving Mexican and Palestinian flags, further intensifying the already volatile situation.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass implemented a curfew from 8 PM to 6 AM in an effort to restore order to the city. “If you drive through downtown LA, the graffiti is everywhere, and significant damage has been done,” Bass said, adding that at least 29 businesses were looted in a single night. The protests have become a rallying cry for those opposing Trump’s immigration tactics, which critics say lack due process and tear families apart.

While the protests have been a significant point of contention, President Trump has taken a hard-line stance against the demonstrations, even mobilizing 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 US Marines to quell the unrest. In an audacious response, Trump suggested it would be “great” if his border czar, Tom Homan, could arrest California Governor Gavin Newsom for his outspoken criticism of the immigration raids. Governor Newsom, in turn, challenged Homan to arrest him, calling Trump’s deployment of troops to Los Angeles an attempt to fulfill “the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial president.”
Amid this growing national debate, Jessica Tarlov’s controversial remark on The Five has garnered widespread attention.
The Controversial Comment
During a segment of The Five, where Tarlov was discussing the ongoing protests and Trump’s immigration policies, she made a remark that many found distasteful. The comment came as the panelists debated the fallout from Trump’s immigration raids and the impact they were having on communities, particularly in immigrant-heavy areas like Los Angeles. Tarlov, in a moment of what seemed to be an offhand remark, asked co-host Jesse Watters, “If Trump’s deportations continue, who will do your manicures?”
Her comment was met with stunned silence from Watters, who appeared to be caught off guard by the question. The comment quickly drew widespread criticism from Fox News viewers, who took to social media to voice their outrage.
Backlash from Fox News Viewers: ‘Elitist’ and ‘Racist’ Remarks
The response to Tarlov’s comment was swift and fierce. On X (formerly Twitter), viewers criticized Tarlov’s remark, accusing her of exhibiting elitism and insensitivity. One viewer blasted the statement as an example of “limousine liberalism,” referring to the stereotypical image of wealthy liberals who, from the comfort of their privilege, fail to understand the struggles of working-class people. Another person agreed, suggesting that Tarlov’s comment echoed a desire for “indentured servants,” referring to the idea that the wealthy rely on the labor of others to maintain their lifestyle without acknowledging their contributions.
“Remember, she gets paid to say stupid stuff,” one Fox News viewer remarked, underscoring the growing frustration many felt toward Tarlov’s tone-deaf comment. Another viewer took to social media to slam the comment as both “racist” and “demeaning,” suggesting that Tarlov was diminishing the hard work of immigrants and essential workers who are often the backbone of the economy.

Perhaps the most cutting response came from a viewer who said Tarlov’s remark encapsulated a common misunderstanding among liberal elites. “They really don’t get why they lose,” the viewer wrote, pointing out that comments like Tarlov’s only serve to alienate people outside the liberal bubble and perpetuate the divide between the political classes.
The Growing Unrest and National Debate Over Immigration
Tarlov’s comments came at a time when the national debate over immigration and deportation policies has reached a fever pitch. The protests in Los Angeles, sparked by what many viewed as heavy-handed immigration tactics, were just one symptom of a larger conflict that has divided the nation. Critics of Trump’s immigration policies argue that they have disproportionately affected immigrant families, many of whom have lived in the United States for years without legal status. The raids have torn apart communities and led to widespread fear among undocumented immigrants, who are now questioning their safety in a country they’ve called home for years.
On the other side, Trump and his supporters argue that strict immigration enforcement is necessary to maintain national security and uphold the rule of law. Trump’s position is clear: deportations and strict border control are vital to protecting the United States from illegal immigration, drugs, and crime. His response to the protests has been blunt, advocating for stronger measures to deter future demonstrations and calling on local governments to enforce the law more aggressively.
With these high stakes, it’s no surprise that tensions are boiling over across the country. The protests have sparked similar demonstrations in other cities, including New York, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, and Atlanta. While some rallies have been small, others have attracted thousands of people, each determined to make their voices heard on the issue of immigration.
Tarlov’s Remarks Highlight the Divide in American Politics
Jessica Tarlov’s comment, while seemingly a minor moment on a cable news show, underscores the deep divisions in American politics and the way in which immigration is shaping political discourse. For many, Tarlov’s comment revealed what they see as a dismissive attitude toward the struggles of working-class Americans, especially those in immigrant communities. At the same time, it highlighted the tendency of some to make light of serious issues that have real-world consequences for millions of people.
The incident also serves as a reminder of the broader cultural and political battles that have been playing out in the United States for years. On one hand, the left is grappling with issues of social justice, equality, and immigration reform, while on the other, conservatives are doubling down on border security, national sovereignty, and traditional values. The immigration debate has become a flashpoint for this larger cultural war, and comments like Tarlov’s only serve to deepen the divide between the two sides.
Conclusion: The Fallout and Future Implications
The fallout from Jessica Tarlov’s comments serves as yet another reminder of how fraught political discourse has become in the United States. What was intended as a seemingly innocuous remark on a cable news panel quickly became a symbol of the broader tensions surrounding immigration, elitism, and race. For many, Tarlov’s comment illustrated the disconnect between the political elite and the everyday struggles of American workers—particularly those in immigrant communities.
As protests continue and the national debate intensifies, the question remains: will the divide between the two political sides ever heal, or are we destined for deeper polarization? The answer remains unclear, but one thing is certain—immigration will remain one of the most contentious issues in American politics for the foreseeable future.
News
My MIL Poured Tea on Me and Served Divorce Papers at Sunday Dinner. “Jake Needs Someone Better”
Part One The iced tea slid over the lip of the cut-crystal pitcher in a thick amber sheet and fell…
“LEAKS OR SMEAR? ‘JAZZY’ CROCKETT FACES ANONYMOUS ACCUSATIONS—BUT WHERE ARE THE RECEIPTS?” Producers say unnamed assistants painted a harsh picture: off‑camera lounging, on‑demand rides, and a red‑carpet attitude. It’s spicy, sure—but none of it is on the record, and no messages, emails, or logs have surfaced to back it up. Is this a genuine HR nightmare or just political theater engineered for clicks? We pulled the claims, chased the paper trail, and noted who declined to comment. Judge the story—not just the sound bites.
A Storm on Capitol Hill In the high-stakes arena of U.S. politics, where every move is scrutinized and every word…
SILENCE AT THE ED SULLIVAN THEATER—AND A THOUSAND THEORIES BY DAWN. For the first time in ages, The Late Show goes dark with no on‑air drumroll, and the questions write themselves. Is CBS quietly fast‑tracking an exit, testing a replacement, or staging a headline‑grabbing reset that only works if nobody sees it coming? The audience can smell when something’s off, and this week feels like a chess move, not a calendar break. If Colbert is staying, why the hush? If he’s not, why the cliffhanger? One empty week has become the loudest story in late‑night, and what happens next could redraw the map for every show that follows. Buckle up—the quiet week might be the plot twist.
Stephen Colbert Heads Into Summer Break Stephen Colbert has officially begun his annual summer hiatus from The Late Show with…
“BOOS. WHISPERS. THEN: ‘SHUT UP.’ KELLY RIPA’S ON‑AIR SNAP—AND MARK CONSUELOS’ QUICK SAVE.” What started as a simple back‑and‑forth turned suddenly combative when a viewer pushed back and Kelly snapped. The crowd answered with a chorus of whispers and boos, and the tension practically hummed—until Mark stepped in, defused the moment, and gave everyone a way out. Is this the cost of speaking your mind in real time, or a host losing patience on a hot morning? The debate’s raging; the video tells its own story.
A Morning Show Takes an Unexpected Turn On Wednesday, August 13, 2025, millions of viewers tuned into ABC’s Live with…
“NO WORDS, JUST A WALK — INSIDE THE 30 SECONDS THAT REWROTE KELLY CLARKSON’S LIVE SEGMENT AND LEFT NBC REELING” A smile, a playful bit, and then the air changed. Kelly Clarkson’s expression went still; Jenna Bush Hager kept talking, unaware the moment had shifted until Kelly stood, slipped past Camera 2, and exited without a word. In the control room: headset chatter, a hard cut, and a scramble to fill the gap. Online, the forensic rewinds began instantly: Which question crossed the line? What was said off‑camera just before the turn? And what does a silent exit communicate that a speech never could? This wasn’t drama for drama’s sake—it felt like a boundary drawn in permanent ink. Watch the viral clip, the angles you didn’t see, and the context that explains the quiet storm 👇
Silence Louder Than Words: Kelly Clarkson’s Calm Walk-Off Stuns Live TV and Puts NBC on Notice It happened without shouting….
MONDAY NIGHT WON’T BE A FAREWELL—IT’LL BE A MUTINY. They weren’t meant to share a stage, let alone a cause. But after CBS axed Colbert—days after he mocked a mega‑deal—late‑night’s rivals are turning into co‑conspirators. No sanitized monologues, no polite handoffs—just a cross‑network show of force that could redraw the rules of TV after dark. So who’s pulling the strings, what’s the plan, and how far are they willing to go? Everything we know is in the comments 👇
Colbert’s Exit Sparks Late-Night Revolt: Fallon, Kimmel, Meyers, and Oliver Plan Historic Stand Stephen Colbert’s abrupt removal from The Late…
End of content
No more pages to load






