Charles Barkley Blasts Stephen A. Smith and Labels LeBron James a ‘Bully’ in Explosive NBA Feud
NBA legend Charles Barkley has entered the fiery debate involving basketball superstar LeBron James and sports commentator Stephen A. Smith, calling Smith’s reaction “lame and weak” and accusing James of behaving like a “bully.”
The feud ignited when Stephen A. Smith publicly criticized Bronny James, LeBron’s son, suggesting that without his father’s influence, Bronny would likely be playing in the NBA’s G League rather than enjoying prominence in the major league. These controversial remarks immediately sparked backlash from LeBron James, culminating in a heated confrontation between the two after a recent Los Angeles Lakers game.
The clash escalated further when LeBron mocked Smith via Instagram, posting footage of Smith boxing, accompanied by comedic sound effects and laughing emojis. This response drew mixed reactions from fans and fellow sports personalities, with many seeing it as beneath the stature of the basketball icon.
Charles Barkley, known for his direct commentary and sharp insights, addressed the controversy during a recent appearance on The Dan Patrick Show. Barkley criticized both parties involved, condemning their actions as unnecessary and immature.
“LeBron, he’s too big to be that type of bully,” Barkley remarked. “I’ve always liked LeBron, but him being a bully, it just turned me off.”
At the same time, Barkley didn’t spare Stephen A. Smith, harshly critiquing the commentator’s prolonged and defensive response as “lame and weak.” Barkley emphasized that both men had handled the situation poorly, stating plainly, “They both had an awful week.”
Further complicating matters, Barkley expressed particular disappointment in James for involving ESPN’s Brian Windhorst in the escalating drama. Barkley staunchly defended Windhorst, a respected sports journalist, saying, “LeBron pissed me off when he went after Brian Windhorst… [He] is a good person, man.”
The contentious exchange has captivated the basketball world, provoking extensive debate on social media and among sports pundits. Fans and experts alike have debated whether Smith’s initial comments crossed a line, or if James’s reaction was excessively aggressive, potentially damaging his reputation as a leading figure in sports.
LeBron’s decision to confront Smith directly, and later to publicly mock him, has raised questions about the appropriate boundaries between athletes and commentators. Critics argue that as one of the most influential athletes globally, LeBron should avoid personal confrontations that may overshadow his professional achievements and philanthropic efforts.
Conversely, defenders of James suggest his fierce response was simply a father protecting his son from unfair public scrutiny. Nevertheless, Barkley’s sharp criticism highlights the broader implications of how public figures manage criticism and disagreements in today’s media-saturated landscape.
In the aftermath, it remains unclear if James and Smith will reconcile or if the feud will deepen. One thing, however, is certain: Charles Barkley’s candid remarks have elevated the discussion, emphasizing the importance of professionalism and respect, regardless of fame or influence.
News
My MIL Poured Tea on Me and Served Divorce Papers at Sunday Dinner. “Jake Needs Someone Better”
Part One The iced tea slid over the lip of the cut-crystal pitcher in a thick amber sheet and fell…
“LEAKS OR SMEAR? ‘JAZZY’ CROCKETT FACES ANONYMOUS ACCUSATIONS—BUT WHERE ARE THE RECEIPTS?” Producers say unnamed assistants painted a harsh picture: off‑camera lounging, on‑demand rides, and a red‑carpet attitude. It’s spicy, sure—but none of it is on the record, and no messages, emails, or logs have surfaced to back it up. Is this a genuine HR nightmare or just political theater engineered for clicks? We pulled the claims, chased the paper trail, and noted who declined to comment. Judge the story—not just the sound bites.
A Storm on Capitol Hill In the high-stakes arena of U.S. politics, where every move is scrutinized and every word…
SILENCE AT THE ED SULLIVAN THEATER—AND A THOUSAND THEORIES BY DAWN. For the first time in ages, The Late Show goes dark with no on‑air drumroll, and the questions write themselves. Is CBS quietly fast‑tracking an exit, testing a replacement, or staging a headline‑grabbing reset that only works if nobody sees it coming? The audience can smell when something’s off, and this week feels like a chess move, not a calendar break. If Colbert is staying, why the hush? If he’s not, why the cliffhanger? One empty week has become the loudest story in late‑night, and what happens next could redraw the map for every show that follows. Buckle up—the quiet week might be the plot twist.
Stephen Colbert Heads Into Summer Break Stephen Colbert has officially begun his annual summer hiatus from The Late Show with…
“BOOS. WHISPERS. THEN: ‘SHUT UP.’ KELLY RIPA’S ON‑AIR SNAP—AND MARK CONSUELOS’ QUICK SAVE.” What started as a simple back‑and‑forth turned suddenly combative when a viewer pushed back and Kelly snapped. The crowd answered with a chorus of whispers and boos, and the tension practically hummed—until Mark stepped in, defused the moment, and gave everyone a way out. Is this the cost of speaking your mind in real time, or a host losing patience on a hot morning? The debate’s raging; the video tells its own story.
A Morning Show Takes an Unexpected Turn On Wednesday, August 13, 2025, millions of viewers tuned into ABC’s Live with…
“NO WORDS, JUST A WALK — INSIDE THE 30 SECONDS THAT REWROTE KELLY CLARKSON’S LIVE SEGMENT AND LEFT NBC REELING” A smile, a playful bit, and then the air changed. Kelly Clarkson’s expression went still; Jenna Bush Hager kept talking, unaware the moment had shifted until Kelly stood, slipped past Camera 2, and exited without a word. In the control room: headset chatter, a hard cut, and a scramble to fill the gap. Online, the forensic rewinds began instantly: Which question crossed the line? What was said off‑camera just before the turn? And what does a silent exit communicate that a speech never could? This wasn’t drama for drama’s sake—it felt like a boundary drawn in permanent ink. Watch the viral clip, the angles you didn’t see, and the context that explains the quiet storm 👇
Silence Louder Than Words: Kelly Clarkson’s Calm Walk-Off Stuns Live TV and Puts NBC on Notice It happened without shouting….
MONDAY NIGHT WON’T BE A FAREWELL—IT’LL BE A MUTINY. They weren’t meant to share a stage, let alone a cause. But after CBS axed Colbert—days after he mocked a mega‑deal—late‑night’s rivals are turning into co‑conspirators. No sanitized monologues, no polite handoffs—just a cross‑network show of force that could redraw the rules of TV after dark. So who’s pulling the strings, what’s the plan, and how far are they willing to go? Everything we know is in the comments 👇
Colbert’s Exit Sparks Late-Night Revolt: Fallon, Kimmel, Meyers, and Oliver Plan Historic Stand Stephen Colbert’s abrupt removal from The Late…
End of content
No more pages to load