The Autopen Conspiracy: Was the Biden Presidency a Fraud?

The notion that Hunter Biden didn’t pardon himself, but that someone else did, and it certainly wasn’t Joe, isn’t a joke; it’s a descent into a constitutional abyss. According to reports, a machine signed orders, pardons were issued by a machine, and a machine allegedly ran the White House. And nobody voted for it. This unsettling narrative, seemingly confirmed by Joe Biden himself during a Super Tuesday campaign rally in March 2024, has ignited a firestorm of controversy, raising profound questions about the legitimacy of the Biden presidency and the integrity of executive power.

The First Crack: Illusion vs. Reality

What initially seemed like a mere gaffe, or “Sleepy Joe being Joe,” has morphed into something far more sinister. Representative James Comer has branded it as “the first visible crack in a presidency held together by illusion.” This illusion, many believe, is now on the verge of shattering, potentially dragging down 21 pardons, numerous executive orders, and a tangled web of insiders that includes figures as diverse as Liz Cheney, Adam Schiff, and Hunter Biden. The focal point of this alleged deception isn’t Joe Biden himself, but rather an individual who reportedly knew precisely what they were doing.

Jill Biden: Caretaker or Puppet Master?

Whispers are growing louder, suggesting that Jill Biden, the First Lady, the caretaker, may have been the real orchestrator of the Biden presidency. While the President purportedly wandered aimlessly on stages, stared blankly into teleprompters, and whispered seemingly fearful confessions into hot microphones, something unprecedented was allegedly unfolding behind the scenes. In a mere two weeks at the close of 2024, a staggering 67 executive orders, 21 presidential pardons, and 11 multi-billion-dollar funding authorizations were supposedly signed, authorized, and bore the exact same signature with machine-like precision. Not a single shaky line, not a single smudge – every curve, every stroke duplicated flawlessly. The culprit? The autopen, a robotic device once relegated to signing holiday cards, is now accused of signing the law of the land.

The Autopen Scandal: A Deeper Dive

The autopen scandal sounds like something ripped from the pages of a dystopian novel. Yet, the pattern is reportedly too glaring to ignore: identical signatures, identical timestamps, and a Commander-in-Chief who allegedly struggled to recall the day of the week, let alone the policies he was ostensibly endorsing. This begs the critical question: if Joe Biden was not mentally present, who was? Who authorized pardons before crimes were even charged? Who sanctioned border policies that overwhelmed towns and threatened sovereignty? Who funneled billions into climate initiatives with reportedly zero oversight? Pam Bondi, now US Attorney General, minced no words, stating that if the President didn’t know what he was signing, then someone else did. And if that someone wasn’t elected by the American people, the implications are grave. This isn’t merely about paperwork; it strikes at the heart of executive power and whether it was commandeered by a machine or the hands guiding it.

A Terminal Diagnosis and a Cover-Up?

Adding another layer of intrigue, a plain manila envelope containing medical records allegedly surfaced on Representative Comer’s desk, revealing a diagnosis of terminal prostate cancer for President Biden, dating back to October 2023. The diagnosis, Gleason score 9, stage 4, metastatic to bone, was reportedly concealed from the American public. This revelation casts a dark shadow over the executive orders signed after the diagnosis, each purportedly issued under the claim of full cognitive authority. This directly contradicts statements made by Dr. Kevin O’Connor, Biden’s long-time physician, who just months earlier declared the President “healthy, vigorous, and fully capable.” With motive, cover-up, and a trail now in plain sight, Bondi declared that every signature must be re-evaluated. The core question boils down to consent: Did the President truly give it?

The Impeachment of Power: Unlawful Executive Impersonation?

Representative Comer, armed with constitutional law experts and digital forensic analysts, presented irrefutable evidence of 44 executive documents bearing President Biden’s signature between October 2023 and January 2025, all reportedly signed using the exact same autopen stroke mapping file. He declared the office of the presidency “impersonated.” The allegation of medical unfitness and Jill Biden’s potential knowledge and authorization of these orders on her husband’s behalf ignited a fierce debate. Bondi didn’t mince words, asserting that if Jill Biden knew and authorized these orders, it constitutes unlawful executive impersonation, punishable by law.

The Testimony: Betrayal and Accountability

Jill Biden’s testimony was a spectacle. Defiant, she denied impersonating her husband and claimed she was merely protecting him. However, Bondi presented damning evidence of internal White House emails requesting autopen authorization and scheduling document batches around Joe Biden’s absences or sedation. The focus shifted from signatures to who wielded the pen and who lied about it. As the story progressed, the question hanging over the chamber was not just one of abuse of power, but whether the American people had been subjected to a long-term scheme.

The Final Blow: Referrals and Nullification

As the hearing came to a close, Representative Comer announced a list of individuals being referred for criminal investigation and potential prosecution: Jill Tracy Biden, Elizabeth Lin Cheney, Hunter Biden, Adam Schiff, and Dr. Kevin O’Connor. The charges ranged from unlawful assumption of executive authority to receipt and concealment of a preemptive presidential pardon. Bondi asserted that this wasn’t about revenge or party lines, but about trust and the betrayal of the American people. As the dust settled, the House voted to formally nullify all presidential pardons signed through unauthorized mechanical means between October 2023 and February 2025, signaling a seismic shift in the balance of power.

The Unanswered Question: Who Ran the Pen?

The hearings, subpoenas, and denials have left one question unanswered: If Joe Biden didn’t sign, if Jill Biden wasn’t authorized, and if Cheney wasn’t even under indictment, who ran the pen? This question pierces the heart of the autopen scandal, begging the question of just how deep the rot truly went. Who orchestrated the chaos and benefited from it? As investigations continue, the search for the truth remains, hidden behind redacted memos, burner phones, and nameless staffers with fingerprints on nothing but power.