The segment you provided from Gutfeld! features a heated panel discussion about recent controversial remarks made by Democratic Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett concerning immigration, labor, and race. Below is a detailed summary of the conversation and its key points:

Controversial Remarks by Jasmine Crockett

During a public event, Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett argued that America needs immigrants because native-born Americans are unwilling to do farm labor. Her controversial wording was:

“Ain’t none of y’all trying to go and farm right now… we are done picking cotton. You can’t pay us enough to find a plantation.”

Her comments implied immigrants are necessary because Americans—specifically African-Americans—won’t engage in manual agricultural labor. This framing sparked intense backlash, criticized as racially insensitive and historically tone-deaf.

Reactions from the Panel

Tyrus’s Reaction:

Tyrus expressed profound frustration at Crockett’s remarks, calling her comments uninformed and offensive. He strongly emphasized that her statements were historically ignorant and harmful:

Direct Quote: “If you’re going to talk about Black history, at least know it.”

He argued Crockett offered no realistic solutions and suggested policy fixes like reforming the immigration lottery system to make legal immigration for agricultural work easier.

He condemned her rhetoric as irresponsible, stating it set back meaningful racial discourse.

Brian Kilmeade’s Comments:

Kilmeade suggested Crockett appeared disconnected and ignorant about contemporary agriculture, implying modern farming is technologically advanced and no longer reliant on manual labor reminiscent of the slavery era. He found her remarks baffling, humorously noting:

Direct Quote: “America has the best farmers in the world. There is glory in doing it. People don’t do it by hand anymore—this isn’t 1820.”

He sarcastically commented that Crockett likely believed she had done well, but actually came across as ill-informed.

Kat Timpf’s Take:

Kat Timpf sharply criticized the inherent racism in Crockett’s statement. She noted that liberal activists, while claiming to fight racism, often unintentionally perpetuate it with comments such as these. Her main points included:

Crockett essentially implied that “Mexicans would pick cotton because Americans won’t.”

She emphasized how such statements reinforce racist stereotypes about immigrants and minorities, concluding that the progressive “woke” movement often perpetuates the racism it claims to oppose.

Emily Compagno’s Response:

Compagno strongly criticized the hypocrisy and insensitivity of the left-wing rhetoric. She offered a personal perspective, describing how her father owns a farm and emphasizing that manual farm labor is honorable work:

Direct Quote: “People like my dad run small farms. We pick grapes by hand—it’s hard work and a thriving industry.”

She accused liberal rhetoric of perpetuating racist stereotypes and economic misconceptions, arguing that farm labor, when fairly paid and properly regulated, benefits both Americans and immigrants.

She also pointed out the contradiction in liberal condemnation of certain individuals (such as Kelly Osbourne) for similar racially insensitive comments, noting the inconsistency in liberal responses.

Broader Implications and Media Reaction

The panel’s consensus was that Crockett’s remarks were racially charged, historically ignorant, and deeply problematic. They criticized liberals for a double standard, arguing that similar statements from conservatives would result in harsh media backlash.

The discussion reflected broader concerns about:

Liberal politicians inadvertently perpetuating stereotypes about immigrant and minority communities.

The outdated perceptions of manual labor and farming in modern America.

The dangers of politicizing racial and immigration issues without thoughtful, fact-based dialogue.

Tone and Atmosphere

The conversation was energetic, at times humorous and sarcastic, but with underlying serious concerns about racial rhetoric and immigration policy. Panelists clearly expressed disappointment and anger toward Crockett’s framing, emphasizing the need for more thoughtful, constructive discourse on these critical issues.

In summary, the segment highlighted a contentious moment in contemporary politics and media, illustrating stark divides in American attitudes toward race, labor, immigration, and political rhetoric.